You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I have read your paper and I greatly appreciate you providing such detailed code for our reference. To better understand your work, I tried to replicate the analysis using your code. However, I noticed that when calculating the term loadings, the positively correlated loadings in the code are described as negatively correlated in the paper. Is there a specific reason for this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your question! The sign of the PLS scores are arbitrary; if I remember correctly, we flipped the scores (x -1) in all analyses simply because I was used to conceptualizing the gradient as going from unimodal to transmodal (instead of from transmodal to unimodal). As a result all loadings also have opposite sign. The sign doesn't add any information, all that matters is that these two poles (red and blue in my case) are opposite.
Thank you for your answer! I have another question: After performing gene enrichment analysis and displaying important biological processes using a word cloud, I would like to know which metric the word cloud is based on. I tried using the p-values of the corresponding biological processes or the category scores, but I couldn't match them one by one. I would like to ask for your advice.
Hello, I have read your paper and I greatly appreciate you providing such detailed code for our reference. To better understand your work, I tried to replicate the analysis using your code. However, I noticed that when calculating the term loadings, the positively correlated loadings in the code are described as negatively correlated in the paper. Is there a specific reason for this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: