Unable to interpret my output

[AbhijittDhavlle]

I am getting some weird output (provided screenshot). If I change my key , the output value is completely different from what I set my key to be. I am unable to interpret my output. Help me asap
.

[JaspinderKaur07]

Hi,
Were you able to find the solution to your problem or interpret what these numbers are?
Thanks and Regards
Jaspinder Kaur

[AbhijittDhavlle]

Hello, No, I m still stuck at the same problem on how to interpret the sequence of operations given by Flush+Reload spy from IAIK github and the numbers printed by the spy program from Mastik github. I just want to know how the original authors got to see or capture the Gnupg secret key with the spy program. I would appreciate if you could help me with the same. Thanks Regards -Abhijitt Dhavlle

…

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019, 9:41 AM JaspinderKaur07 ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, Were you able to find the solution to your problem or interpret what these numbers are? Thanks and Regards Jaspinder Kaur PhD, IIT Ropar — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZJC_BEDaP3ZrOyToINx9ormZY_gmyvxks5vZi7vgaJpZM4YRa-f> .

[JaspinderKaur07]

Thank you for the reply. I am also stuck here. I got any solution will let you know for sure. Thanks and Regards Jaspinder PhD Scholar, IIT Ropar On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:46 PM AbhijittDhavlle <[email protected]> wrote:

…

Hello, No, I m still stuck at the same problem on how to interpret the sequence of operations given by Flush+Reload spy from IAIK github and the numbers printed by the spy program from Mastik github. I just want to know how the original authors got to see or capture the Gnupg secret key with the spy program. I would appreciate if you could help me with the same. Thanks Regards -Abhijitt Dhavlle On Sat, Mar 23, 2019, 9:41 AM JaspinderKaur07 ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, > Were you able to find the solution to your problem or interpret what these > numbers are? > Thanks and Regards > Jaspinder Kaur > PhD, IIT Ropar > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#4 (comment) >, > or mute the thread > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZJC_BEDaP3ZrOyToINx9ormZY_gmyvxks5vZi7vgaJpZM4YRa-f > > . > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AumKoEpP9LSTrn2wkTVPv1vQM5DObHt1ks5vZjcqgaJpZM4YRa-f> .

-- Jaspinder Kaur

[nepoche]

Hello, I'm sorry I've let this github repo decay.

The newspy.cpp program outputs the guess at the secret key. The key in the codebase is '0000...0000' (on line 38), so it is definitely not outputting the correct values. Did you follow all of the steps outlined in the readme - especially the parts about cache hit/miss thresholds and t-table addresses?

[JaspinderKaur07]

Yes, I did. Output for it on my system(Intel Xeon) was 250 for threshold and oi also updated the addresses.

…

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019, 8:15 AM nepoche ***@***.***> wrote: Hello, I'm sorry I've let this github repo decay. The newspy.cpp program outputs the guess at the secret key. The key in the codebase is '0000...0000' (on line 38), so it is definitely not outputting the correct values. Did you follow all of the steps outlined in the readme - especially the parts about cache hit/miss thresholds and t-table addresses? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AumKoGR0OAxq1nf_iw57IG5TQwOXiFrsks5vZubQgaJpZM4YRa-f> .

[JaspinderKaur07]

Hey, are you able to find the reason for the error. On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 3:30 PM JASPINDER KAUR <[email protected]> wrote:

…

Yes, I did. Output for it on my system(Intel Xeon) was 250. On Sun, Mar 24, 2019, 8:15 AM nepoche ***@***.***> wrote: > Hello, I'm sorry I've let this github repo decay. > > The newspy.cpp program outputs the guess at the secret key. The key in > the codebase is '0000...0000' (on line 38), so it is definitely not > outputting the correct values. Did you follow all of the steps outlined in > the readme - especially the parts about cache hit/miss thresholds and > t-table addresses? > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#4 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AumKoGR0OAxq1nf_iw57IG5TQwOXiFrsks5vZubQgaJpZM4YRa-f> > . >

-- Jaspinder Kaur

[JaspinderKaur07]

Hey, Did you find the reason for the eeror. Please let me know as well if you do so. On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:46 PM AbhijittDhavlle <[email protected]> wrote:

…

Hello, No, I m still stuck at the same problem on how to interpret the sequence of operations given by Flush+Reload spy from IAIK github and the numbers printed by the spy program from Mastik github. I just want to know how the original authors got to see or capture the Gnupg secret key with the spy program. I would appreciate if you could help me with the same. Thanks Regards -Abhijitt Dhavlle On Sat, Mar 23, 2019, 9:41 AM JaspinderKaur07 ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, > Were you able to find the solution to your problem or interpret what these > numbers are? > Thanks and Regards > Jaspinder Kaur > PhD, IIT Ropar > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#4 (comment) >, > or mute the thread > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZJC_BEDaP3ZrOyToINx9ormZY_gmyvxks5vZi7vgaJpZM4YRa-f > > . > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AumKoEpP9LSTrn2wkTVPv1vQM5DObHt1ks5vZjcqgaJpZM4YRa-f> .

-- Jaspinder Kaur

[b-saideepak]

I think it is a problem with the shared library location. Can you see if the libcrypto.so is present at /usr/local/lib ? If not, update the locations wherever needed with the location where the library is present. That solved the issue for me.