Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check out Laplacian alternative #23

Open
schlegelp opened this issue Dec 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Check out Laplacian alternative #23

schlegelp opened this issue Dec 27, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@schlegelp
Copy link
Collaborator

Note to self: check out https://github.com/nmwsharp/robust-laplacians-py for the mesh contraction.

@schlegelp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

A first quick & dirty test yielded mixed results: sometimes the robust-laplacian is marginally faster, sometimes our own. The main problem is that the number of steps it takes to get below epsilon varies which in turn makes for a bad comparison: if three steps get you within 1% of the target epsilon it will run a fourth which will (a) take much longer and (b) overshoot the target.

The results from robust-laplacian look better though. Might be because of the mollify_factor?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant