You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have generated 30 peers using PEER package on my dataset of 146 samples.
Including all of the peers along with other covariates to run cis-eqtl analysis on my cohorts generated NA in p-values, however if I include only 15 first peers every thing goes well.
Interesting point is if I only include peers #16 -30 everything is ok with it.
Could anyone know what could be the cause pf the issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Ahmad,
thank you for the report. Ricard (cc-d) has folded PEER into the
multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA) framework as described below - we
recommend using this going forward, as it is properly supported, and it may
resolve your issues.
Leo
From Ricard:
Running MOFA (https://github.com/bioFAM/MOFA2) with one view is
effectively PEER. We have also added functionalities and visualisations to
interpret the factors before regressing them out for eQTL mapping or any
other downstream analysis.
I’ve built a wrapper here:
https://github.com/bioFAM/PEER
Let me know if you have any questions. We have a Slack channel where I
provide individualised help. The link is in the MOFA2 github.
We have not made the official release yet as we would like to get some
feedback how this is working and how intuitive this is. Please let me know
about your experience
Best,
Ricard.
I have generated 30 peers using PEER package on my dataset of 146 samples.
Including all of the peers along with other covariates to run cis-eqtl analysis on my cohorts generated NA in p-values, however if I include only 15 first peers every thing goes well.
Interesting point is if I only include peers #16 -30 everything is ok with it.
Could anyone know what could be the cause pf the issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: