We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/mxenabled/protobuf-nats/blob/master/lib/protobuf/nats/client.rb#L18
Despite a firm limit on subscriptions at 512, we're seeing more than 2k connections.
Saw this opened here but I believe this bug is related to this gem: mperham/connection_pool#170
It's possible subscriptions are leaking out here: https://github.com/abrandoned/protobuf-nats/blob/84d632feb39684358b39727a4d5689c2545d3589/lib/protobuf/nats/client.rb#L245-L248
However, we should rewrite this implementation to use a single subscription like the official request method of the nats libraries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Spiked out an impl here: #2
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/mxenabled/protobuf-nats/blob/master/lib/protobuf/nats/client.rb#L18
Despite a firm limit on subscriptions at 512, we're seeing more than 2k connections.
Saw this opened here but I believe this bug is related to this gem: mperham/connection_pool#170
It's possible subscriptions are leaking out here: https://github.com/abrandoned/protobuf-nats/blob/84d632feb39684358b39727a4d5689c2545d3589/lib/protobuf/nats/client.rb#L245-L248
However, we should rewrite this implementation to use a single subscription like the official request method of the nats libraries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: