You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Moving forward, properties are going to be simpler. This aligns with some long term goals of better taking advantage of ES6 classes.
@property will always synthesize a backing ivar with a _ prefix.
@synthesize goes away.
@dynamic goes away.
@observe is useful, but in practice we only use a single case (change + after). We also always call a single "update" method regardless of the changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ivars may no longer be manually defined. For ivars without public getter/setter methods, use the private attribute.
Backing ivars are accessed as an identifier of (_ + property name) when inside of a method definition.
The actual implementation of backing ivars (whether or not they exist as properties on an object) is left up to the compiler. The compiler may decide to removed the property as an optimization, or it may decide that a getter/setter can be inlined for performance reasons.
As a result of 3, use of ivars from a category is now prohibited.
As a result of 3, use of ivars from a subclass is now prohibited.
Subclasses may not redefine properties. In practice, this is rarely an issue.
Moving forward, properties are going to be simpler. This aligns with some long term goals of better taking advantage of ES6 classes.
@property
will always synthesize a backing ivar with a_
prefix.@synthesize
goes away.@dynamic
goes away.@observe
is useful, but in practice we only use a single case (change
+after
). We also always call a single "update" method regardless of the changes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: