Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a SQL / Document feature #43

Open
gedw99 opened this issue Sep 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Add a SQL / Document feature #43

gedw99 opened this issue Sep 5, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@gedw99
Copy link

gedw99 commented Sep 5, 2020

Cete looks pretty strong.

I have a few thoughts on some things that can be easily add.

  1. Lets Encrypt.
  1. Search
@gedw99 gedw99 changed the title A Few issues Add a SQL / Document feature Sep 5, 2020
@gedw99 gedw99 changed the title Add a SQL / Document feature Add a SQL / Document feature Sep 5, 2020
@mosuka
Copy link
Owner

mosuka commented Sep 8, 2020

@gedw99
That's a good idea to store the certificates in cete itself.
Regarding SQL support, I'd like to keep Cete as a simple KVS server and try to implement a SQL server built on top of Genji.
What do you think?

@gedw99
Copy link
Author

gedw99 commented Sep 8, 2020

Hey @mosuka

I was thinking exactly the same thing. Use GRPC for the API.
The API with Genji is really easy to use also so it will be quite easy to make a GRPC API on top.
Its just tables and standard SQL.

Also as a GRPC API the genji shell can then be used remotely to help with Ops.

Personally i think it shoudl be done in their github Org, because there are many people there to help out etc.

I am building a Flutter based Admin system on top of Genji at the moment, and use GRPC with FLutter everyday. Works like a dream. Run anywhere ( Web, Desktop, Mobile).

Genji slack. You should raise all this with them !!
https://app.slack.com/client/T029RQSE6/CKPCYQFE0/thread/CKPCYQFE0-1598618530.005300

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants