Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data center compatibility #9

Open
johnrc opened this issue Dec 3, 2015 · 7 comments
Open

Data center compatibility #9

johnrc opened this issue Dec 3, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@johnrc
Copy link

johnrc commented Dec 3, 2015

Any idea what it'd take to make this plugin cluster or data center compatible? Looking at the code, settings are persisted using PluginSettings. That seems to save to the database which would be safe and usable for a cluster.

@monitorjbl
Copy link
Owner

I suspect the plugin will work on Datacenter distributions just fine. The problem with making it officially compatible is that I don't have a way of testing it and making sure that it always stays compatible.

@johnrc
Copy link
Author

johnrc commented Dec 6, 2015

Makes sense. I'll give it a shot and see how it goes. The Confluence documentation makes it sound easy to test plugins on a cluster. I suspect it's similar for Stash but I don't know enough about it.

@ebukoski
Copy link

Has anyone tried to modify this plugin for Data Center compatibility?

@monitorjbl
Copy link
Owner

To my knowledge no, but it may work in that environment. I don't have one to test with, sadly.

@ebukoski
Copy link

The plugin did install on Data Center but with a warning and "INCOMPATIBLE" badge.

I'm planning on testing and will report back here if I find any issues.

@kutsal
Copy link

kutsal commented Jul 28, 2017

I just created a PR (#21) for this which fixes a potential issue fetching plugin configuration given a Data Center setup.

@ebukoski
Copy link

@monitorjbl Can we get PR #21 merged to support the Data Center users?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants