ltex.hiddenFalsePositives.en-US.txt

{"rule":"ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE","sentence":"^\\QAmong these we use, pyrosm Pyrosm which is a Python library designed specifically for reading OSM data in different formats and conducting data processing operations.\\E$"}
{"rule":"HYPOTHESIS_TYPOGRAPHY","sentence":"^\\QFor the spatial discretization, we use H3 hexagons with a resolution of 9.\\E$"}
{"rule":"ALL_WAYS","sentence":"^\\QPyrosm filters out all ways that have the following tags:\\E$"}
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QHowever, there are some limitations in the NEXI metrics.\\E$"}
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QThese factors suggest a need for refinement in the NEXI methodology to enhance its practical utility in urban development and planning.\\E$"}
{"rule":"ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE","sentence":"^\\Q\\E(?:Dummy|Ina|Jimmy-)[0-9]+\\Qfree-floating vehicle public transport \\E(?:Dummy|Ina|Jimmy-)[0-9]+\\Qsharing module module \\E(?:Dummy|Ina|Jimmy-)[0-9]+\\Q walking \\E(?:Dummy|Ina|Jimmy-)[0-9]+\\Q Example Repeating Module Matrix\\E$"}
{"rule":"CD_NN","sentence":"^\\QScenario Modules Key Points 1 Walking Walking Baseline scenario 2 Personal Car Personal Vehicle Benchmark scenario 3 Public Transport Evaluate the effectiveness public transport systems 4 Bicycle Sharing Evaluate the effectiveness of bicycle sharing systems 5 Public Transport and Bicycle Sharing Evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable multi-modal transport systems Scenarios for Urban Mobility Analysis\\E$"}
{"rule":"ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE","sentence":"^\\QScenario Modules Key Points 1 Walking Walking Baseline scenario 2 Personal Car Personal Vehicle Benchmark scenario 3 Public Transport Evaluate the effectiveness public transport systems 4 Bicycle Sharing Evaluate the effectiveness of bicycle sharing systems 5 Public Transport and Bicycle Sharing Evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable multi-modal transport systems Scenarios for Urban Mobility Analysis\\E$"}
{"rule":"PHRASE_REPETITION","sentence":"^\\QScenario Modules Key Points 1 Walking Walking Baseline scenario 2 Personal Car Personal Vehicle, Walking Benchmark scenario 3 Public Transport Public Transport, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness public transport systems 4 Bicycle Sharing Evaluate the effectiveness of bicycle sharing systems 5 Public Transport and Bicycle Sharing Evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable multi-modal transport systems Scenarios for Urban Mobility Analysis\\E$"}
{"rule":"PHRASE_REPETITION","sentence":"^\\QScenario Modules Key Points Walking Walking Baseline scenario Personal Car Personal Vehicle, Walking Benchmark scenario Public Transport Public Transport, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness public transport systems Bicycle Sharing Vehicle Sharing, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness of bicycle sharing systems Public Transport and Bicycle Sharing Public Transport, Bicycle Sharing, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable multi-modal transport systems Scenarios for Urban Mobility Analysis\\E$"}
{"rule":"ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE","sentence":"^\\QScenario Modules Key Points Walking Walking Baseline scenario Personal Car Personal Vehicle, Walking Benchmark scenario Public Transport Public Transport, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness public transport systems Bicycle Sharing Vehicle Sharing, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness of bicycle sharing systems Public Transport and Bicycle Sharing Public Transport, Bicycle Sharing, Walking Evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable multi-modal transport systems Scenarios for Urban Mobility Analysis\\E$"}
{"rule":"POSSESSIVE_APOSTROPHE","sentence":"^\\QRequired cost for optimal over all hexagons scenario mean 25% 50% 75% bicycle 0.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 bicycle_public_transport 0.94 0.00 1.00 1.00 car 0.37 0.19 0.38 0.38 public_transport 0.70 0.00 0.00 2.20 walking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00\\E$"}
{"rule":"POSSESSIVE_APOSTROPHE","sentence":"^\\QRequired cost for optimal over all hexagons scenario mean 25% 50% 75% max bicycle 0.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 bicycle_public_transport 0.94 0.00 1.00 1.00 4.20 car 0.37 0.19 0.38 0.38 1.33 public_transport 0.70 0.00 0.00 2.20 3.20 walking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00\\E$"}
{"rule":"CURRENCY","sentence":"^\\QFurther, increasing the price to 2.20€ yields an improvement for the public transport scenario, where it is now possible to reach all categories within approximately 19 minutes.\\E$"}
{"rule":"CURRENCY","sentence":"^\\QSimilarly, comparing bicycle sharing to the combined scenario of bicycle sharing and public transport, we see that the maximum required cost is 4.20€ for the combined scenario, compared to 1.00€ for the bicycle sharing scenario.\\E$"}
{"rule":"ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE","sentence":"^\\QNumber of monthly visits per category category monthly visits groceries 12 education 20 health 0.42 banks 9 parks 2.4 sustenance 6.12 shops 4\\E$"}
{"rule":"ALL_OF_THE","sentence":"^\\QThis is a clear indicator for the superiority of bicycle sharing over public transport in terms of accessibility improvements, especially, when considering that the bicycle sharing infrastructure does not cover all of the considered area.\\E$"}
{"rule":"THE_SUPERLATIVE","sentence":"^\\QWe see evidence for complement I in the observation that bicycle sharing is most effective for the 80% more accessible hexagons, while public transport is mostly only effective for the 20% least accessible hexagons.\\E$"}
{"rule":"COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2","sentence":"^\\QWe see that bicycles sharing and public transport alone are roughly of equal importance when it comes to making hexagons that are not able to reach all necessities in 15 minute by walking.\\E$"}
{"rule":"EN_SIMPLE_REPLACE","sentence":"^\\QWe know that approximately 69% of all considered hexagons and with that 69% of all residential in the administrative district Cologne (\"Stadtkreis Köln\") are 15-minute city by walking.\\E$"}
{"rule":"EN_SIMPLE_REPLACE","sentence":"^\\QWe know that approximately 69% of all considered hexagons and with that 69% of all residential in the administrative district Cologne (\"Stadtkreis Köln\") are 15-minute city by walking, which shows us that Cologne largely already has an excellent accessibility.\\E$"}
{"rule":"THE_SUPERLATIVE","sentence":"^\\QMore precisely, while bicycle sharing is more effective in decreasing the 15-minute city metric on average and also for the 75% most accessible regions, public transport is more effective than bicycle sharing for the 10% least accessible regions.\\E$"}
{"rule":"THIS_NNS","sentence":"^\\QFixable hexagons by mode The data indicates a modest trend where hexagons that achieve 15-minute city criteria solely through bicycle sharing (marked in orange) tend to be nearer to the city center compared to those that achieve this criteria solely via public transport.\\E$"}
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QFor the most part, at least for Cologne, this means that bicycle sharing is highly effective where the \"Flez-Zone\" is located.\\E$"}
{"rule":"EN_SIMPLE_REPLACE","sentence":"^\\QFirst, approximately 69% of all considered hexagons and with that 69% of all residential in the administrative district Cologne (\"Stadtkreis Köln\") are 15-minute city by walking, which shows us that Cologne largely already has an excellent accessibility.\\E$"}
{"rule":"EN_SIMPLE_REPLACE","sentence":"^\\QIn addition, approximately 69% of all considered hexagons and with that 69% of all residential in the administrative district Cologne (\"Stadtkreis Köln\") are 15-minute city by walking, which shows us that Cologne largely already has an excellent accessibility.\\E$"}