-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
how to analys the results, whatever values are coming in the end in the dictonary, how to evaluate them , what are they : are they probability value, are they kaapa score #138
Comments
@Shrishti120 please give more guideline, or codebase issues |
Ok,
So I was trying to access the code which is in process.py which is
import os,sys
sys.path.insert(0,"..")
from glob import glob
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import argparse
import skimage, skimage.io
import pprint
import torch
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torchvision, torchvision.transforms
import torchxrayvision as xrv
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument('-f', type=str, default="", help='')
parser.add_argument('img_path', type=str)
parser.add_argument('-weights', type=str,default="densenet121-res224-all")
parser.add_argument('-feats', default=False, help='', action='store_true')
parser.add_argument('-cuda', default=False, help='', action='store_true')
parser.add_argument('-resize', default=False, help='', action='store_true')
cfg = parser.parse_args()
img = skimage.io.imread(cfg.img_path)
img = xrv.datasets.normalize(img, 255)
# Check that images are 2D arrays
if len(img.shape) > 2:
img = img[:, :, 0]
if len(img.shape) < 2:
print("error, dimension lower than 2 for image")
# Add color channel
img = img[None, :, :]
# the models will resize the input to the correct size so this is optional.
if cfg.resize:
transform = torchvision.transforms.Compose([xrv.datasets.XRayCenterCrop(),
xrv.datasets.XRayResizer(224)])
else:
transform = torchvision.transforms.Compose([xrv.datasets.XRayCenterCrop()])
img = transform(img)
model = xrv.models.get_model(cfg.weights)
output = {}
with torch.no_grad():
img = torch.from_numpy(img).unsqueeze(0)
if cfg.cuda:
img = img.cuda()
model = model.cuda()
if cfg.feats:
feats = model.features(img)
feats = F.relu(feats, inplace=True)
feats = F.adaptive_avg_pool2d(feats, (1, 1))
output["feats"] = list(feats.cpu().detach().numpy().reshape(-1))
preds = model(img).cpu()
output["preds"] = dict(zip(xrv.datasets.default_pathologies,preds[0
].detach().numpy()))
if cfg.feats:
print(output)
else:
pprint.pprint(output)
and I got output as
'preds': {'Atelectasis': 0.52231383,
'Cardiomegaly': 0.14971305,
'Consolidation': 0.5107231,
'Edema': 0.018210562,
'Effusion': 0.55934864,
'Emphysema': 0.5045767,
'Enlarged Cardiomediastinum': 0.5371645,
'Fibrosis': 0.43839028,
'Fracture': 0.15676177,
'Hernia': 0.03712785,
'Infiltration': 0.34870642,
'Lung Lesion': 0.0014005175,
'Lung Opacity': 0.6327572,
'Mass': 0.7738221,
'Nodule': 0.5024437,
'Pleural_Thickening': 0.25367537,
'Pneumonia': 0.50162745,
'Pneumothorax': 0.5065439}
Now I am not able to understand how to evaluate this result and what these
values are, are these kappa score or probability values
The image I took says that it has Pneumonia but the output gives
significantly less percent of Pneumonia.
I will be very grateful if you could help.
Than you.
Regard
Shrishti Pandey
…On Fri, 21 Jul, 2023, 4:45 pm Adesoji Alu, ***@***.***> wrote:
@Shrishti120 <https://github.com/Shrishti120> please give more guideline,
or codebase issues
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#138 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APAWHGAANYW2O2O2SBBQK7LXRJQFLANCNFSM6AAAAAA2SWKQFA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
They are probability values
The model may be wrong or the image is labelled wrong. This is the challenge with AI models. You can process the image with this tool and use the explain function to generate a heatmap to explain the predictions: https://mlmed.org/tools/xray You may also want to read "Section 2.5 Model Calibration" in the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00595 which discusses the calibration of the model and our attempt to make the 0.5 prediction meaningful. Also, this paper discusses the generalization issues of these types of models: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02497 |
I am getting poor results I have a labelled dataset but that also model predicted really bad results, I tested it on 30 images out of 30 images I am able to get correct results only on 9-10 Is it possible that I can train it if I have the dataset? |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: