You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Annotations should be associated with a given image slice. So when multiple slices have annotations, the output should be 3-dimensional, rather than flattened into 2D.
Notes on full vs sparse array? For just the annotations, it is likely that we can just export a sparse array across slices - data isn't required where there is no labelling. Necessary information is about which slice number is labelled. This is also input into the ML model.
Also think about the situation where someone might want to download the full array once it has been annotated - the size might not be that big if a large number of pixels are 0, since this could likely be compressed pretty easily.
Based on outputs of #25
Annotations should be associated with a given image slice. So when multiple slices have annotations, the output should be 3-dimensional, rather than flattened into 2D.
Also include in the output:
{1: "box"}
) - these are user-defined names (depends on Add a "custom annotation class" generator #36)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: