This seems to be too good to be locked to KDE!

[ghost]

Though I've read that you're likely to integrate babe-qt with KDE, would you consider making the current and future KDE dependencies optional like the other very fine player Cantata?

[ghost]

No, I have a pure Qt5 (Fluxbox) system, I'm very fine with locking to the Qt side!

…

On 23 June 2017 at 21:51, JuanCAlpizar ***@***.***> wrote: Don't wanna play devil's advocate but I think it's more locked to the Qt side than KDE itself, and on the GTK side of the street there are also good looking and similar solutions already, like lollypop https://gnumdk.github.io/lollypop-web/ you can give it a try if you're on a GTK+ environment while this opens to other frameworks — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#37 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXFmv-ar1nxj-0_ewylTdUONiG1P0Ngks5sHAkVgaJpZM4Nd9mB> .

[JuanCAlpizar]

@AcarBurak you're totally right! Sorry, I actually deleted my original comment because didn't notice you commented about it, but I went and check the build dependiencies and noticed in fact it's meant specifically integrated with some KDE components, would be cool if they actually implement it for a Qt wide environment 👍