-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
haveno: add package #68
Comments
Why don't you submit the code as merge request in nixpkgs? Makes it easier to review |
Because they are banned. |
"they" xD i still think its interesting whether |
sounds like the thing i would get banned for :D Make that a merge request to an upstream branch that is synced with upstream and ping us |
nah, please help yourself
NixOS/moderation@8369649#commitcomment-144375785
see my hate-maintainers-censored tldr: im "too rude" in my comments |
I don't care for politics in open-source i will work with people who's views i don't agree with and won't obstruct their work, but i won't review if you do the code development in this shitty issue way like it's a kindergarten tossing balls at each other. I have my merge request submitted you can submit changes to my fork branch for me to merge them and submit them to nixpkgs for example. |
ok, good luck : ) i had the impression that the people i pinged i have spent enough time on haveno already |
interest in haveno running without issues and implemented in a sane and controlled way |
Why the long and hacky unpack phase? Should be handled via NixOS#272380 As it's likely a complexity-induced issue that is not obvious to see rn |
you mean i dont remember whether this works with but thats implementation detail like i said, before spending more time on this |
screw gradle2nix you should be using the provided gradle setup hook |
oh man, im so happy that i "left" nixpkgs... its a matter of taste which is better but thats implementation detail... |
correct wait a few days and try again with new version |
it's about consensus on packages if you think that things should be done differently in an objectively better way then there is an RFC for it instead of doing subjective shits just because "i prefer them" reto works in the present version |
yeah, i prefer to do my subjective shit but hey, good luck porting reto to nixpkgs |
Your adjustments up to this point were correct, you should have just left the app running.
Haveno-reto is not a scam. I have made over 30 trades there.
Mods are in the SimpleX chat or as arbs in the client if there are problems. |
any progress with haveno on nixos?
currently i can reach 2 of 8 seed nodes haveno-ping.sh
|
No, why I think you are working on it.
Some seeds are gone or under DOS, but new ones are coming with v1.0.10, because everyone has to generate new .onion addresses for externalTor.
The client won't connect to more than 2. After bootstrap you no longer need seed nodes. The network is P2P. |
no. i stopped working on
because nixos has no FHS paths like
but generally, using precompiled files is a security risk my |
fix NixOS#293842
based on NixOS#311314
based on tadfisher/gradle2nix#62
draft in haveno/default.nix
haveno is not working
the desktop app is working, but it fails to connect to seednodes
i dont know whether this is a problem with the client or a problem with the haveno network
the gui statusbar says: no seed nodes available
the seednode seems offline:
bugc27z7lqjgpwmhbuu3kuwoq2bhailj573r32jm5ydwrcqrwjtblnid.onion:1002
the main version of haveno is broken by design
because the authors want to separate development from deployment
so im using the haveno-reto fork
which has seednodes and different keys
but otherwise its exactly the same code
is haveno a scam
it is possible that haveno is a scam, a waste of time
https://old.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/1cqf02p/haveno_mainnet_documentation_released/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/1e60nc8/haveno_instances_experience/
haveno-dex/haveno#1142
haveno/readme.txt
future work
i already spent too much time on this...
if someone wants to get their hands dirty on this
i would recommend to first try a binary release of haveno-reto
maybe with
steam-run
, maybe with buildFHSEnvmaybe on a different linux distro like arch linux
to verify that
haveno-reto
is actually workingthen i would modify gradle2nix so that my mkOverride function is applied to all jar files
maybe there are still some libs or bins that need to be patched
otherwise
haveno
silently fails... but that is an optimistic viewping @Kreyren @linsui @emmanuelrosa @chayleaf @surfaceflinger @TanvirOnGH @shortwavesurfer2009 @nahuhh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: