We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This looks very smart and a new way to overcome NAT.
About 5% of remote devices will not be able to do UDP based NAT punch through. So does this code include a stun and relay service ?
Also have you tested on symmetric NAT routers ? That is hard to break through; especially when both devices are behind this type of router.
What ports does this use ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Joe!
This looks very smart and a new way to overcome NAT. About 5% of remote devices will not be able to do UDP based NAT punch through. So does this code include a stun and relay service ?
We are using STUN and UPnP for NAT traversal.
We don't test yet speccialy for specific NAT routers.
It's random generating between 40000-60000 ports on first network join and storing into user pref file.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This looks very smart and a new way to overcome NAT.
About 5% of remote devices will not be able to do UDP based NAT punch through. So does this code include a stun and relay service ?
Also have you tested on symmetric NAT routers ? That is hard to break through; especially when both devices are behind this type of router.
What ports does this use ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: