Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Usage #2

Open
joeblew99 opened this issue Jan 30, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Usage #2

joeblew99 opened this issue Jan 30, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@joeblew99
Copy link

This looks very smart and a new way to overcome NAT.

About 5% of remote devices will not be able to do UDP based NAT punch through. So does this code include a stun and relay service ?

Also have you tested on symmetric NAT routers ? That is hard to break through; especially when both devices are behind this type of router.

What ports does this use ?

@miolini
Copy link
Member

miolini commented Feb 2, 2016

Hello Joe!

This looks very smart and a new way to overcome NAT.

About 5% of remote devices will not be able to do UDP based NAT punch through.
So does this code include a stun and relay service ?

We are using STUN and UPnP for NAT traversal.

Also have you tested on symmetric NAT routers ? That is hard to break through;
especially when both devices are behind this type of router.

We don't test yet speccialy for specific NAT routers.

What ports does this use ?

It's random generating between 40000-60000 ports on first network join and storing into user pref file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants