Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) supports #4

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Sep 6, 2019

"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

Can you add support for?

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html

-PLUS variants:

LDAP:

  • RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:

2FA:

IANA:

Linked to:

@mawis
Copy link
Owner

mawis commented Sep 7, 2019

Sounds reasonable. I'll see what I can do.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

@mawis: Have you progressed on it?

Note: SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) + 2FA are new.

@Neustradamus Neustradamus changed the title SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) supports SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS supports Nov 1, 2020
@Neustradamus Neustradamus changed the title SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS supports SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) supports Nov 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants