You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hiya! Thanks for providing django-imagekit and pilkit. We've noticed that thumbnailing huge images (~320 megapixels) is extremely heavy and we've experienced timeouts due to this.
I'll probably be forking and applying this change myself, so I can make a pull-request at that point. What's this project's philosophy on supporting older Pillow/PIL versions? I obviously have no need of backwards-compatibility for my own purposes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! Thank you for your interest in django-imagekit and pilkit. Normally we are kind of conservative about backward compatibility. Probably I need to see what it the version bundled in the major distributions which are still supported and aim for that. I suppose that Pillow there will be lower than 7.
If the usage of reducing_gap can be made optional (use it if available) then this will be perfect.
Hiya! Thanks for providing django-imagekit and pilkit. We've noticed that thumbnailing huge images (~320 megapixels) is extremely heavy and we've experienced timeouts due to this.
Pillow 7.0.0 introduced a new "reducing_gap" argument that makes resizing these large images a lot more efficient: https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/7.0.0.html#new-argument-reducing-gap-for-image-resize-and-image-thumbnail-methods
I'll probably be forking and applying this change myself, so I can make a pull-request at that point. What's this project's philosophy on supporting older Pillow/PIL versions? I obviously have no need of backwards-compatibility for my own purposes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: