You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The computations do a straightforward translation of what is in the 632+ paper. A few months ago I emailed Brad Efron about this asking if it was roughly equivalent to doing a few permutations of the outcome and computing the metric. He responded in the affirmative. I'm going to be implementing the 632+ rule in tune and will be using that approach (because some metrics are not the sum of their single values).
You might think about that too since the current computation is nxn. outer() can help but permutations might be more efficient otherwise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The computations do a straightforward translation of what is in the 632+ paper. A few months ago I emailed Brad Efron about this asking if it was roughly equivalent to doing a few permutations of the outcome and computing the metric. He responded in the affirmative. I'm going to be implementing the 632+ rule in tune and will be using that approach (because some metrics are not the sum of their single values).
You might think about that too since the current computation is nxn.
outer()
can help but permutations might be more efficient otherwise.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: