Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
127 lines (72 loc) · 7.59 KB

bypassing-cylance-and-other-avs-edrs-by-unhooking-windows-apis.md

File metadata and controls

127 lines (72 loc) · 7.59 KB
description
EDR / AV Evasion

Bypassing Cylance and other AVs/EDRs by Unhooking Windows APIs

Context

If you've tried dumping lsass.exe process memory from an endpoint where CylancePROTECT is running, you know you will be having a hard time.

This lab shows how it's still possible to dump the process memory and bypass Cylance (or any other Antivirus/Endpoint Detection & Response solution) that uses userland API hooking to determine if a program is malicious during its execution.

Hooking is an old technique and I've read about it in the past, but never had a chance to play with it, until I stumbled upon a post by Hoang Bui who wrote about unhooking EDRs https://medium.com/@fsx30/bypass-edrs-memory-protection-introduction-to-hooking-2efb21acffd6.

{% hint style="info" %} This lab demonstrates API unhooking in the context of MiniDumpWriteDump API, but it could be done against any other hooked API. {% endhint %}

What is hooking?

API hooking could be compared to a web proxy - all API calls (including their arguments) that your application makes (say CreateFile,ReadFile, OpenProcess, etc), are intercepted and inspected by AVs/EDRs which then decide if the action/intent of the program is malicious or not.

How is hooking done?

The way EDR vendors hook userland APIs is by hijacking/modifying function definitions (APIs) found in Windows DLLs such as kernel32/kernelbase and ntdll.

Function definitions are modified by inserting a jmp instruction at their very beginning. Those jmp instructions will change program's execution flow - the program will get redirected to the EDRs inspection module which will evaluate if the program exhibits any suspicious behaviour and it will do so by analyzing the arguments that were passed to the function that the EDR is hooking/monitoring. This redirection is sometimes called a detour/trampoline.

Hopefully the below diagram helps clarify it further:

It's worth noting that not all the functions get hijacked by AVs/EDRs. Usually only those functions that are known to be abused over and over again in the wiled that get hooked - think CreareRemoteThread, NtQueueApcThread and similar.

Related Notes

{% content-ref url="detecting-hooked-syscall-functions.md" %} detecting-hooked-syscall-functions.md {% endcontent-ref %}

{% content-ref url="../code-injection-process-injection/how-to-hook-windows-api-using-c++.md" %} how-to-hook-windows-api-using-c++.md {% endcontent-ref %}

Execution

Getting Caught by Cylance

Note that this lab is based on another lab where I wrote a small C++ program that used MiniDumpWriteDump Windows API to dump the lsass.exe process memory - Dumping LSASS without Mimikatz == Reduced Chances of Getting Flagged by AVs.

Let's try and run the code (referenced in the above lab) on a system that is monitored by CylancePROTECT. The program gets killed with Violation: LsassReadstraight away:

As you could have guessed, it Cylance hooks the MiniDumpWriteDump API call. To be more precise, it actually hooks a NtReadVirtualMemory from ntdll.dll which is called under the hood by the MiniDumpWriteDump.

Confirming the Hook

Executing the program with debugger, it can be observed that very early in the process execution, a Cylance Memory Protection Module CyMemDef64.dll gets injected into Invoke-CreateMemoryDump.exe (my program that leverages MiniDumpWriteDump) process - this is the module that will be inspecting the API calls made by Invoke-CreateMemoryDump.exe:

Since we know that MiniDumpWriteDump calls NtReadVirtualMemory, we can take a peek at NtReadVirtualMemory function definition to see if there's anything suspicious about it:

{% code title="@WinDBG" %}

u NtReadVirtualMemory

{% endcode %}

We immediately see that the first instruction of the function is a jmp instruction to some weird memory address which falls outside the ntdll module's memory address ranges:

Let's dissassemble that address:

{% code title="@WinDBG" %}

u 0000000047980084

{% endcode %}

We can immediately see that there are further jmp instructions to Cylance Memory Protection Module CyMemDef64.dll - this confirms that the function NtReadVirtualMemory is hooked:

To confirm that our program will eventually call NtReadVirtualMemory, we can put a breakpoint on it and continue our program's execution - as shown in the below screengrab, the breakpoint is hit:

If we continue the program execution at this point, it will be redirected (jmp instruction) to Cylance's Memory Protection Module and the program will be bust with the Violation: LsassRead message.

Unhooking

In order to unhook or, in other words, restore the hooked function to its initial state, we need to know how it looked like before it got modified by Cylance.

This is easy to do by checking the first 5 bytes of the function NtReadVirtualMemory that can be found in c:\windows\system32\ntdll.dll before it gets loaded into memory. We can see the function's Relative Virtual Address (RVA) in ntdll's DLL exports table - which in my case is 00069C70 (will probably be different on your system):

If we convert the RVA to the physical file location (which is the same as RVA since the file is not yet in memory), we can see that the first 5 bytes of the function are 4c 8b d1 b8 c3:

What the above means is that if we replace the first 5 bytes (e9 0f 64 f8 cf) of the NtReadVirtualMemory that were injected by Cylance, to 4c 8b d1 b8 3c, Cylance should become blind and no longer monitor MiniDumpWriteDump API calls.

With this information, we can update the program and instruct it to find the address of function NtReadVirtualMemory and unhook it by writing the bytes 4c 8b d1 b8 3c to the beginning of that function as shown in line 17 below:

Recompiling and running the program again dumps lsass.exe process memory successfully without Cylance interferance:

We can now take the dump file offline and load it into mimikatz...

I only unhooked one function, but the process could be automated to unhook all functions by comparing function definitions in the DLL on the disk with their definitions in memory. If the function definition in memory is different, it meants it is hooked and should be patched with instructions found in the definition on the disk.

References

Great references below, including Cylance themselves talking about unhooking:

{% embed url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hP9HcaZtyA" %}

{% embed url="https://medium.com/@fsx30/bypass-edrs-memory-protection-introduction-to-hooking-2efb21acffd6" %}

{% embed url="https://www.mdsec.co.uk/2019/03/silencing-cylance-a-case-study-in-modern-edrs/" %}