Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Webcam Support - mediamtx - WHEP? #1559

Closed
hostrup opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1558
Closed

Webcam Support - mediamtx - WHEP? #1559

hostrup opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1558
Labels
💡 Type: FR Requests a new feature

Comments

@hostrup
Copy link

hostrup commented Sep 19, 2023

Requested feature:

Hi!
I am trying to configure mainsail to use my unifi g3 intant cam.
I was unable to use the rtsp or rtsps stream directly from unifi protect.
so instead i choose to install mediamtx - as i saw mainsail supported that.

Now mediamtx is wokring - and i have access to my unifi cams from my mediamtx server.

i am however not able to use it inside mainsail. I keep getting errors - becuase it's trying to start a WS session.
as far as i understand - from this link:

bluenviron/mediamtx#1845

mediamtx - is not supporting websockets anymore - instead they suggest to use WHEP.

I found this PR:
#1558

Can anyone tell me if this will actually solve the problem with never version of mediamtx - and provide the ability to use webrtc via WHEP inside mainsail?

Solves the following problem:

No response

Additional information:

No response

@meteyou
Copy link
Member

meteyou commented Sep 19, 2023

Yes. the PR #1558 is the WHEP implementation for this webcam client.

@hostrup
Copy link
Author

hostrup commented Sep 19, 2023

awesome!
I will be ready to test it - onced it's released!
Thanks alot :D

br Ronni

@hostrup hostrup closed this as completed Sep 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💡 Type: FR Requests a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants