You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The ThinkPy interpreter currently fails silently when accessing undefined variables in certain contexts, particularly within enumerate loops. Instead of raising an error, it treats undefined variable names as string literals, leading to confusing runtime errors.
Current Behavior
forscore, weightinenumerate(weights):
total=total+ (scores[index] *weight) # 'index' is undefined but doesn't raise error
Currently produces a TypeError: list indices must be integers or slices, not str because index is treated as a string literal rather than raising an undefined variable error.
Expected Behavior
The interpreter should raise a clear RuntimeError: Undefined variable: index when attempting to access undefined variables.
Proposed Solution
Implement proper variable scoping in the interpreter:
Add a scope stack to track variables in different contexts
Implement scope push/pop for loops and other block structures
Add proper variable lookup through the scope chain
Maintain ability to handle string literals while catching undefined variables
Implementation Details
classThinkPyInterpreter:
def__init__(self, explain_mode=False, format_style="default", max_iterations_shown=5):
self.state= {} # Global variable storageself.scopes= [] # Stack of local scopes# ... rest of __init__ remains the same ...defpush_scope(self):
"""Create a new local scope"""self.scopes.append({})
defpop_scope(self):
"""Remove the current local scope"""ifself.scopes:
self.scopes.pop()
defget_variable(self, name):
"""Look up a variable in the current scope chain"""# Check local scopes from innermost to outermostforscopeinreversed(self.scopes):
ifnameinscope:
returnscope[name]
# Check global scopeifnameinself.state:
returnself.state[name]
raiseRuntimeError(f"Undefined variable: {name}")
defset_variable(self, name, value, is_global=False):
"""Set a variable in the appropriate scope"""ifis_globalornotself.scopes:
self.state[name] =valueelse:
self.scopes[-1][name] =valuedefevaluate_expression(self, expr):
"""Evaluate an expression and return its value"""ifisinstance(expr, (int, float, bool)):
returnexprifisinstance(expr, str):
try:
returnself.get_variable(expr)
exceptRuntimeError:
# If it's not found as a variable, treat it as a string literalifexprinself.builtins:
returnself.builtins[expr]
returnexprifisinstance(expr, dict):
# ... rest of complex expression handling remains the same ...passreturnexprdefexecute_enumerate_loop(self, loop_stmt):
"""Execute an enumerate loop with proper variable scoping"""index_var=loop_stmt['index']
value_var=loop_stmt['element']
iterable_name=loop_stmt['iterable']
iterable=self.get_variable(iterable_name)
ifnothasattr(iterable, '__iter__'):
raiseRuntimeError(f"{iterable_name} is not a collection we can enumerate")
self.explain_print("LOOP", f"Starting an enumerate loop over {iterable_name}")
self.explain_print("INFO", f"Total number of items to process: {len(iterable)}")
self.indent_level+=1self.push_scope() # Create new scope for loop variablestry:
fori, valueinenumerate(iterable):
self.set_variable(index_var, i)
self.set_variable(value_var, value)
ifself.explain_mode:
ifi<self.max_iterations_shown:
self.explain_print("ITERATION",
f"Loop #{i+1}: {index_var} = {i}, {value_var} = {value}")
elifi==self.max_iterations_shown:
remaining=len(iterable) -self.max_iterations_shownself.explain_print("INFO",
f"... {remaining} more iterations will be processed ...")
forstatementinloop_stmt['body']:
result=self.execute_statement(statement)
ifisinstance(result, dict) andresult.get('type') =='return':
returnresultfinally:
self.pop_scope() # Always clean up the scopeself.indent_level-=1ifself.explain_mode:
self.explain_print("COMPLETE", f"Loop finished after processing {len(iterable)} items")
Test Cases
Basic undefined variable access
Enumerate loop variable scope
String literal handling
Built-in function access
Nested scope handling
Impact
This change will improve error messaging and catch programming errors earlier in the development process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
The ThinkPy interpreter currently fails silently when accessing undefined variables in certain contexts, particularly within enumerate loops. Instead of raising an error, it treats undefined variable names as string literals, leading to confusing runtime errors.
Current Behavior
Currently produces a
TypeError: list indices must be integers or slices, not str
becauseindex
is treated as a string literal rather than raising an undefined variable error.Expected Behavior
The interpreter should raise a clear
RuntimeError: Undefined variable: index
when attempting to access undefined variables.Proposed Solution
Implement proper variable scoping in the interpreter:
Implementation Details
Test Cases
Impact
This change will improve error messaging and catch programming errors earlier in the development process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: