Make REST and GraphQL server running on the same port

[dhmlau]

Description / Steps to reproduce / Feature proposal

Originated from the discussion in #1899 (comment)

Currently the REST server is running at http://localhost:3000 and using oasgraph loosely, the GraphQL server will be running at http://localhost:3001.
Ideally, it would be REST and GraphQL should share the same port.

Acceptance Criteria (needs discussion/ to be refined)

• Use the generated OpenAPI schema by the library (already installed by --enable-graphql in our application) and get an internal representation of the GraphQL Schema
• Use that generated GraphQL Schema to create an internal end-point (ie: /lb4graphql) by the internal express and use the express-graphql to consume that schema
• (optional) Create a CLI option --enable-graphql

cc @bajtos @marioestradarosa

[bajtos]

See the discussion in https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/pull/1899/files#r227358497 where I am advocating for a new extension package.

Cross-posting it here for posterity.

Does it make sense to have it in a separate package?, it takes two packages and a couple of lines to implement it.

If we keep graphql built into our @loopback/rest package, then we end up with a tight coupling to a specific semver-major version of oasgraph . Whenever oasgraph makes breaking changes, we need to release a new semver-major vresion of @loopback/rest.

We have been bitten by this kind of tight coupling many times in LB 3.x. I don't remember a single time when we would wish an independent extension was built into the framework. There were many times we wished a built-in feature was packaged as a standalone extension from the beginning: offline sync, authentication & authorization layer, etc.

Also by forcing all @loopback/rest consumers to depend on oasgraph, we make it harder for people not using GraphQL to avoid possible security vulnerabilities in oasgraph and its dependencies.

Last but not least, while oasgraph may be a good solution for prototyping GraphQL support, I think it's not suitable for production deployment on sites with a decent amount of traffic, because it cannot optimize database queries to fetch data from multiple related models in a single SQL query. I'd like us to look into ways how to allow LB4 app developers to leverage full power of database access and relations in the GraphQL API, see #656 and https://github.com/strongloop/loopback4-extension-graphql. If we bundle oasgraph as the default GraphQL implementation, we are nudging app developers to use a tool that may shoot them in their foot in a near future of their project.

[marioestradarosa]

The extension package would be living inside the loopback-next as a repo?

[bajtos]

The extension package would be living inside the loopback-next as a repo?

Possibly. Although I think it may be better to keep the code in https://github.com/strongloop/loopback4-extension-graphql, at least until we have our own implementation invoking repositories directly (without the oasgraph layer).

[jannyHou]

We have been bitten by this kind of tight coupling many times in LB 3.x. I don't remember a single time when we would wish an independent extension was built into the framework. There were many times we wished a built-in feature was packaged as a standalone extension from the beginning: offline sync, authentication & authorization layer, etc.

+1 For @bajtos 's concern. And I would vote for a new extension package too. A good practice for our extensibility.

A proposal:

• Allow the component takes in a server instance by injection.
• If the server is provided, add the graphql route to it, if not then create a new server like the current code.

Feel free to correct the details ^

[bajtos]

If the server is provided, add the graphql route to it, if not then create a new server like the current code.

Well if there is no REST server, then there is no REST API to create GraphQL interface for.

IMO, the component should discover all RestServer instances configured by the app and a create a new GraphQL endpoint for each server instance.

In the first iteration, it may be simpler to assume the application is RestApplication and mount the GraphQL interface on the single rest server. Essentially do the same as REST API Explorer does now.

https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/blob/fcc76df71f2fe837dd62847418e9aa7e39da575a/packages/rest-explorer/src/rest-explorer.component.ts#L19-L34

[bajtos]

Considering the growing importance of GraphQL, I am proposing to make GraphQL a first-class citizen of LB4:

• Implement the extension in loopback-next using the same conventions we have for REST (directory: packages/graphql, package name: @loopback/graphql).
• Close existing issues in https://github.com/strongloop/loopback4-extension-graphql, move the repo to strongloop-archive org and archive it (make it readonly).

[jannyHou]

Suggestion from @raymondfeng :
We could do it in 2 steps:

• (in the shopping example)Add an express app, mount lb4 app and oasgraph app to it.

• enable the template above in the CLI

  • like --oasgraph

• the first-class support for graphql like miroslav's proposal in the comment above

  • the separation(different building blocks) of graphql UI (explorer UI) , graphql schema and graphql resolvers.
  • start with oasgraph and make it extensible to support the native graphql.
    • now we translate lb metadata into openapi spec, oasgraph takes the openapi spec and translate it to graphql spec. During this two-step translation we lose metadata. It would be good if we can translate to native graphql spec directly.

[jannyHou]

summary of estimation meeting:

See the proposal above ^ let's continue discussion.

[bajtos]

Let's take a look at how oasgraph-cli mounts the GraphQL on express:

https://github.com/strongloop/oasgraph/blob/8016aa8398fd3812605d378552875f055de05702/packages/oasgraph-cli/src/oasgraph.ts#L111-L137

import * as graphqlHTTP from 'express-graphql'

function startGraphQLServer(oas, port) {
 createGraphQlSchema(oas, {
    strict: program.strict,
    viewer: program.viewer,
    addSubOperations: program.addSubOperations,
    fillEmptyResponses: program.fillEmptyResponses
  }) 
     .then({schema, report}) => {
        // ...
        app.use('/graphql', graphqlHTTP({
          schema: schema,
          graphiql: true
        }))
        // ...
     });

Now as far as I understand GraphQL, it uses a single URL with two verbs GET and POST (see https://graphql.org/learn/serving-over-http/). As a result, it should be pretty easy to build a controller that provides two methods (GET /graphql and POST /graphql) and calls express-graphql under the hood to serve the request. Look at the following existing code for inspiration:

• REST API Explorer: how it creates a controller with configurable HTTP path
• StaticAssetsRoute: how it invokes serve-static middleware in async/await friendly way

I think the component should be fairly easy to implement and therefore I prefer to do this properly from the beginning, don't mount the LB4 app on an Express app.

[marioestradarosa]

@bajtos , but internally there is already an express instance used by the API Explorer, I guess?. If you plugin express-graphql, OASGraph and the app.restServer.getApiSpec() you can have the /graphql in the LB4 app.

The following is a pseudo code that could be running in the same code where the REST Server is exposing the api explorer (I guess, not sure for now). But at the end, the OASGraph is just transcoding from one format to another, and it is the express-graphql and the express server that will finally be calling the LB4 REST endpoints linked to this schema, right?.

const {schema} await OASGraph.createGraphSQSchema(
 app.getServer.getApiSpec(), 
strict: false, 
viewer:true,  
addSubOperations: true, 
);

and then using the internal reference to express (I don't recall very well, but I saw it :-)

express.use('/graphql',  graphqlHTTP(
{
  schema: schema,
   graphiql: true
}

This express object, can then use the same port as the api explorer?. The blocks are there, but I am not sure if this would be the best approach, but sounds simple .

[luxaritas]

Per the early comment by @bajtos:

Last but not least, while oasgraph may be a good solution for prototyping GraphQL support, I think it's not suitable for production deployment on sites with a decent amount of traffic, because it cannot optimize database queries to fetch data from multiple related models in a single SQL query.

I think this is arguably more important than just letting oasgraph run on the same port (which on a cursory look should be pretty straightforward, with a similar conclusion to the above comment). Is this within scope of this conversation/does it require a new issue? Is the final step of the current plan referring to creating a new Server implementation or still using oasgraph as a proxy?

[bajtos]

Last but not least, while oasgraph may be a good solution for prototyping GraphQL support, I think it's not suitable for production deployment on sites with a decent amount of traffic, because it cannot optimize database queries to fetch data from multiple related models in a single SQL query.

I think this is arguably more important than just letting oasgraph run on the same port (which on a cursory look should be pretty straightforward, with a similar conclusion to the above comment). Is this within scope of this conversation/does it require a new issue?

As far as I understand oasgraph, it cannot fetch related models in a single query, it's a limitation given by design. We will have to roll out our own GraphQL layer that will leverage model relation metadata and repository implementations. No need to open a new issue for that, it's already tracked by #656 and possibly by strongloop-archive/loopback4-extension-graphql#4

[bajtos]

but internally there is already an express instance used by the API Explorer

Not at all. REST API Explorer contributes a Controller class implementing dynamic endpoints (e.g. the main HTML page serving the front-end UI) and calls app.static to expose static front-end assets (e.g. JavaScript and CSS files).

const {schema} await OASGraph.createGraphSQSchema(
 app.getServer.getApiSpec(), 
strict: false, 
viewer:true,  
addSubOperations: true, 
);

This code snippet looks reasonable 👍

express.use('/graphql',  graphqlHTTP(
{
  schema: schema,
  graphiql: true
}

I prefer to use LB4 handlers instead of accessing underlying Express instance. Here is a code snippet to illustrate what I mean:

const urlPath = '/graphql';
const handler = graphqlHTTP({schema, graphiql: true});
const spec = {
  'x-visibility': 'undocumented',
  responses: {},
};

app.route('get', urlPath, spec, handler);
app.route('post', urlPath, spec, handler);

[dougal83]

I'm excited by this discussion. I've tried implementing the code above on top of express EDITED LINK.

Personally, I am really excited to see support for graphql coming along.

[sreerajkrishnank]

Any updates on this?

[dhmlau]

@dougal83, seems like your repo is no longer accessible? I got a 404 when clicking on the link and when looking up for the repo as well.

When talking to @bajtos this morning, he also mentioned something similar, i.e. mounting to express app (?). I haven't got a chance to try it out yet, but here is his code snippet:

 // server schema:
  const app = new MyLbApp();
  app.mountExpressRouter('/graphql', graphqlHTTP({
    schema,
    graphiql: true
  }))
  app.start();

[dougal83]

@dhmlau Thanks. I will take a closer look soon.

[SephReed]

Would it be possible to just forward one port to the other?

[tritoanst]

This code is OK for me.
Any issue for this?

import {ApiApplication} from './application';
import {ApplicationConfig} from '@loopback/core';
import * as graphqlHTTP from 'express-graphql';
import { createGraphQlSchema } from 'openapi-to-graphql';
import { Oas3 } from 'openapi-to-graphql/lib/types/oas3';

export {ApiApplication};

export async function main(options: ApplicationConfig = {}) {
  const app = new ApiApplication(options);
  await app.boot();
  await app.start();
  const url : string = <string>app.restServer.url;
  console.log(`Server is running at ${url}`);

  const graphqlPath = '/graphql'; 
  const oas: Oas3 = <Oas3>app.restServer.getApiSpec();
  const {schema}  = await createGraphQlSchema(oas, {
    strict: false, 
    viewer:true,
    baseUrl: url,
  } );
  const handler : graphqlHTTP.Middleware = graphqlHTTP({
    schema,
    graphiql: true
  });
  app.mountExpressRouter(graphqlPath, handler );
  console.log(`Graphql: ${url}${graphqlPath}`);

  return app;
}

[christo911]

Works for me... until JWT from header is is needed...
Seems that the headers are changed by express-graphql, so if you are using JWT Authentication as in
looppback4-example-shopping

Its not possible to get the JWT token (valid) from the header and respective service... then get the 401 unauthorised response.

also setting the context doesn't help

const handler : graphqlHTTP.Middleware = graphqlHTTP( (request, response, graphQLParams) => ({
        schema,
        pretty: true,
        graphiql: true, 
        context:  {  request: request,  response: response},
    }))

If I look at the headers in the loopback App context ( found file sequence.ts), each time I make a post or get, then I get 2 different headers... First one has the Auth JWT, Second one does not (seems to override)

bit lost now..

[christo911]

Managed to get the JWT this way and works fine for me.

const graphqlPath = '/graphql'
    const oas: Oas3 = <Oas3>app.restServer.getApiSpec()
    const {schema} = await createGraphQlSchema(oas, {
        strict: false,
        viewer: true,
        baseUrl: url,
        headers: {
            'X-Origin': 'GraphQL'
        },
        tokenJSONpath: '$.jwt'
    })

    const handler : graphqlHTTP.Middleware = graphqlHTTP( (request, response, graphQLParams) => ({
        schema,
        pretty: true,
        graphiql: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development', // Needed to activate apollo dev tools (Without true then interface does not load)
        context: { jwt: getJwt(request) }
    }))

    // Get the jwt from the Authorization header and place in context.jwt, which is then referenced in tokenJSONpath
    function getJwt(req:any) {
        if (req.headers && req.headers.authorization) {
            return req.headers.authorization.replace(/^Bearer /, '');
        }
    }

    app.mountExpressRouter(graphqlPath, handler);
    console.log(chalk.green(`Graphql API: ${url}${graphqlPath}`))

[stale]

This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository. This issue will be closed within 30 days of being stale.

[stale]

This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository.