Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hi @hyang336, We had a discussion today and we are going to implement stim coding in the next few months. Please stay tuned :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi there,
In the interim you should be able to do stimulus coding by including a stim
column that tells the model which response should have been made for that
stimulus, and a response column that corresponds to which response was made
(rather than correct and errors). Then if you coded stim as simply 1 and -1
then specify v ~ stim this should give positive coefficients for stim.
Michael
…On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:25 PM tigretigre ***@***.***> wrote:
Any updates on this one? Anything I can do to contribute to move it along
more quickly?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#475 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG7TFC3ZACZEJ4J4X3MQDLZXREA5AVCNFSM6AAAAABKBCACKKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTANZQG4ZDGNI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
AlexanderFengler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear HSSM community,
What is the correct way to use stimulus coding for responses and models? If using DDM, I take that "-1" means "incorrect" and "1" means "correct" in the response column. Could I instead use those two values to represent two response options instead of accuracy? For something like race model with more than two response options, is the response by-default stimulus coded (i.e., each particle represents evidence accumulation of one response option)?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions