validating efficiency

[lqzhao]

Hi, thanks for your great work.
I found the validating efficiency is not good because it will cost about 10 hours to test each image with 6 scales.
I reduce the number of scales to 1, i.e., 1.0, but it still costs about 3 hours. So here is the question:

Can we just set a larger batch size when testing? The current version doesn't support a larger batch size than 1.

[liuzhengzhe]

Good idea. I think it is feasible. lqzhao ***@***.***> 于2021年8月23日周一 下午11:26写道：

…

Hi, thanks for your great work. I found the validating efficiency is not good because it will cost about 10 hours to test each image with 5 scales. I reduce the number of scales to 1, i.e., 1.0, but it still costs about 3 hours. So here is the question: Can we just set a larger batch size when testing? The current version doesn't support a larger batch size than 1. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB7WPDDQ5M7RL75OMB4EO7LT6JSD7ANCNFSM5CU2NSCA> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&utm_campaign=notification-email> .