-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
learn --local or learn test --local #8
Comments
Not clear that we want to support this? Collecting data on user test runs is valuable, both for measuring a students progress and also performing cheat detection. I agree we should do what we can to speed up the learn --test command, but I don't think circumventing the connected aspect is the right solution. |
The use case for skipping the remote submission of the local test run is as an instructor, when developing a lab, I need to both make sure that Sometimes When I'm writing a lesson, for speed, I mostly run As a student, anytime I want to be able to run the test suite without an internet connection, |
I see, so we would not document this as a student-facing feature? I'm OK with that. |
It's a feature of the test runner implemented by the In an ideal world, there would be comprehensive API documentation for this gem. All features and mode would be documented in that. Then there would be Guides, "Using the But no matter what, if you run |
closed by aeba815 |
It'd be awesome to be able to send a
--local
flag tolearn-test
so that it just wraps the appropriate test runner and doesn't try submitting or authenticating. Would make running 'test' runs way faster.Relates to #7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: