We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allows more flexibility when the project does not use the conventional auth.providers.users.model
auth.providers.users.model
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could use some flexibility here as well - specifically we have 2 user providers and it could be beneficial to choose/config which to use.
I could attempt a PR, would like know if @JeffreyWay is interested in such a feature.
Thanks for an awesome package!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Allows more flexibility when the project does not use the conventional
auth.providers.users.model
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: