Adding Events and Times

[marcverhagen]

It is probably not very controversial to use Event here and we could go with the TimeML attributes. My hunch would be to not add things like Process and State as subtypes, but deal with them in the same way as we deal with kinds of NamedEntities.

As for times, is it okay to use Timex or does that get us to close to Timex2 and Timex3 and is something more generic like TimeExpression better?

[nancyide]

I think TimeExpression is better, but it’s kinda long.

…

On Jun 6, 2017, at 12:46 PM, marcverhagen ***@***.***> wrote: It is probably not very controversial to use Event here and we could go with the TimeML attributes. My hunch would be to not add things like Process and State as subtypes, but deal with them in the same way as we deal with kinds of NamedEntities. As for times, Is it okay to use Timex or does that get us to close to Timex2 and Timex3 and is something more generic like TimeExpression better? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#56>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD7Nv-81zSV_nGeS-NJjzSMJ24BiZ7cUks5sBYJLgaJpZM4Nxnc4>.

----------------------------------------------------- Nancy Ide Professor of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Vassar College Poughkeepsie, New York 12604-0520 USA tel: (+1 845) 437 5988 fax: (+1 845) 437 7498 email: [email protected] http://www.cs.vassar.edu/~ide

-----------------------------------------------------

[marcverhagen]

Still much shorter than DependencyStructure so there is precedent.

[ksuderman]

I like the brevity of Timex, but I think it's too close to Timex2 and Timex3, so I think we have to go with TimeExpression. Everything else is spelled out in full so it would be consistent.

[ksuderman]

Bump. I notice this is marked with milestone 1.3.0 which is the next version of the vocabulary to be released. I don't think there is anything controversial here so we should just go ahead and do it.

To backtrack on my above comment, I think we should use Timex; that is just the abbreviated name, the actual discriminator will be http://vocab.lappsgrid.org/Timex.

[keighrim]

How about TimeEx or TimeExp?