-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update column specs in spec.yaml #5
Comments
Yes, we need to discuss this in depth! But right now, this means that some (all?) datasets are coded inconsistently. I think for some we can programmatically fix it (e.g. for most older papers). The overarching goal is to increase usability and transparency, but it should of course not come at the cost of data integrity. So with these points in mind, what do you think we should do? |
I was wondering whether the Code Book could live on the MetaLab website instead of in the Google spreadsheet, basically as the spec.yaml but with a more user-friendly interface i.e. in a pretty table. This would avoid discrepancies between the two. but I wonder whether you think many users would struggle to find this Code Book compared to if it is just in the Google spreadsheet? We also need a way for users to add their own rows to the CodeBook when they add non-obligatory columns which might be tricky. Can discuss when we meet tomorrow, @christinabergmann |
That would of course be ideal, they went out of synch and keeping track across multiple documents is always hard. Maybe @erikriverson can point us to a simple way of displaying spec.yaml in a user-friendly format. |
Some progress on a couple of ideas:
|
Thanks @erikriverson ! (removing my assignment to help me keep track of my tasks, but if I can help again at any stage let me know!) |
There are currently discrepancies between spec.yaml and the MA template codebook. I assume the MA template has been updated more recently? If true, the spec sheet will need to be updated before new data can be added to the database.
Two issues @anjiecao came across in the course of working on a MA for the challenge.
I suspect there are other discrepancies, but these are two we came across.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: