You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the idea is to satisfy the problem of sending a list of "nearby Vs", while achieving better interoperability, in a way that is agnostic to the type of network identifier
for now, the proposal assumes that "nearby Vs" is the only type of contextual data that U would ever want to send to W
do we have concrete examples of other kind of contextual data that should be sent to W?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
geonnave
changed the title
Reduce the usage of opaque_info in EAD_1
Can we turn opaque_info into concrete fields, in EAD_1?
Mar 19, 2024
geonnave
changed the title
Can we turn opaque_info into concrete fields, in EAD_1?
Can we turn opaque_info into more concrete fields, in EAD_1?
Mar 19, 2024
I am interested in exploring how we can reduce, as much as possible, the use of opaque_info, for the following reasons:
Proposal
The proposal so far is to replace
opaque_info
bynearby_vs
:Some comments:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: