Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add S390x support in affinity rule #503

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

modassarrana89
Copy link
Contributor

Added s390x in node affinity rule as already work is going on to support s390x for tensorflow in runtime-adaptor

Added s390x in node affinity 

Signed-off-by: Modassar Rana <[email protected]>
Added s390x for node affinity

Signed-off-by: Modassar Rana <[email protected]>
@modassarrana89 modassarrana89 changed the title S390x Added S390x support in affinity rule Apr 30, 2024
@modassarrana89
Copy link
Contributor Author

@njhill @ckadner @rafvasq Can you guys please review & do the needful

@modassarrana89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @njhill

Copy link
Member

@rafvasq rafvasq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @modassarrana89, based on the checks it seems like you also need to lint your changes when you get a chance.

controllers/modelmesh/runtime.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Updated comments 

Signed-off-by: Modassar Rana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Modassar Rana <[email protected]>
@modassarrana89
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rafvasq I have updated the comment & lint the changes on x86. Please review & do the needful

@rafvasq rafvasq requested review from rafvasq and removed request for joerunde, tjohnson31415 and njhill May 27, 2024 20:20
@rafvasq rafvasq changed the title Added S390x support in affinity rule feat: add S390x support in affinity rule May 27, 2024
Copy link
Member

@rafvasq rafvasq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay in returning to this @modassarrana89. It looks like you'll have to lint as before.

@ckadner
Copy link
Member

ckadner commented May 27, 2024

@modassarrana89 -- I updated your branch and fixed the linting issue

Copy link
Member

@ckadner ckadner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Thanks @modassarrana89

@kserve kserve deleted a comment from oss-prow-bot bot May 27, 2024
@ckadner
Copy link
Member

ckadner commented May 28, 2024

/lgtm

@oss-prow-bot oss-prow-bot bot added the lgtm label May 28, 2024
Copy link

oss-prow-bot bot commented May 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ckadner, modassarrana89, rafvasq

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
Copy link

oss-prow-bot bot commented May 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ckadner, modassarrana89, rafvasq

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rafvasq rafvasq merged commit 31ebe73 into kserve:main May 28, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants