-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev: deploy l1 contracts on dockerized anvil node in local-rpc #1285
Labels
enhancement
Enhancement of the code, not introducing new features.
Comments
enitrat
added
the
enhancement
Enhancement of the code, not introducing new features.
label
Jul 7, 2024
anukkrit149
pushed a commit
to karnotxyz/kakarot-rpc
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2024
## Pull request type Please check the type of change your PR introduces: - [ ] Bugfix - [x] Feature - [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming) - [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes) - [ ] Build related changes - [ ] Documentation content changes - [ ] Other (please describe): ## What is the current behavior? Accounts have their own implementation and needs to be upgraded when Kakarot is. Resolves kkrt-labs#1280 Resolves kkrt-labs#1275 ## What is the new behavior? Accounts class is never updated and is a transparent proxy. Each call to the account starts by fetching the current implementation in Kakarot, then make a `library_call`. <!-- Reviewable:start --> - - - This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/kkrt-labs/kakarot/1285) <!-- Reviewable:end --> --------- Co-authored-by: enitrat <[email protected]>
@enitrat is this done? |
no, this is still relying on the dynamic addresses deployed on the anvil node. As long as the order of deployment and the key account used to deploy are the same, this is not an issue because they will always have the same addresses. |
what is the status of this @enitrat ? |
v low prio so nothing done |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
following #1284 we have an anvil node that acts as the settlement layer used with Katana.
in .katana/messaging_config.json we hardcoded the address of the StarknetMessaging contract - but it would be better to, in the docker-compose, deploy the StarknetMessaging and L1KakarotMessaging contracts and put them in the .env to make it more robust.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: