Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
37 lines (31 loc) · 1.81 KB

summary.md

File metadata and controls

37 lines (31 loc) · 1.81 KB

Summary

The AudioMoth acoustic logger by Open Acoustic Devices has the ability to capture accurate soundscape recordings, but adding protective housings and placing them on trees can significantly alter the sensitivity and frequency response. Pink noise recordings were used to analyze the frequency-dependent sensitivity of the AudioMoth in four housings and two environments (open grassland, forest).

The on-axis frequency response of the AudioMoth without a case is mostly flat, with a 10 dB boost above 3 kHz (blue line in plot below). Of the four housings tested (Ziplock bag, vacuum seal bag, laser-cut case, Open Acoustics Devices injection-moulded case), the bags caused the least change in frequency response. For AudioMoth v1.2.0, the injection-moulded case increased directionality: sounds arriving from the front are recorded with higher volume than sounds arriving from other directions. Compared to the AudioMoth, the Song Meter Micro by Wildlife Acoustics has a non-flat frequency response but is relatively omnidirectional despite its protective housing.

image

In an open environment, with or without housing, high-frequency sounds (>10 kHz) arriving from behind the device strongly are attenuated. When the AudioMoth is deployed by strapping it on a tree, sounds arriving from behind the device are attenuated by about 10 dB below 1 kHz and 20 dB or more above 1 kHz. Also, a notch filter occurs at a specific frequency (about 2.3 kHz) when sound arrives from directly in front of the device.

image

Protective housings and placement on trees clearly cause significant reductions of sensitivity to certain frequencies. These effects should be considered during the deployment of recorders and during the analysis of recorded audio.