Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
20241122
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
kevinboone committed Nov 22, 2024
1 parent fd43195 commit 99a69d3
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 24 changed files with 6,382 additions and 0 deletions.
333 changes: 333 additions & 0 deletions alsa_bitperfect.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

220 changes: 220 additions & 0 deletions back_to_alsa.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Kevin Boone: Going back to ALSA in 2024</title>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="https://kevinboone.me/img/favicon.ico">
<meta name="msvalidate.01" content="894212EEB3A89CC8B4E92780079B68E9"/>
<meta name="google-site-verification" content="DXS4cMAJ8VKUgK84_-dl0J1hJK9HQdYU4HtimSr_zLE" />
<meta name="description" content="%%DESC%%">
<meta name="author" content="Kevin Boone">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width; initial-scale=1; maximum-scale=1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/main.css">
</head>


<body>

<div id="myname">
Kevin Boone
</div>

<div id="menu">
<a class="menu_entry" href="index.html">Home</a>
<a class="menu_entry" href="contact.html">Contact</a>
<a class="menu_entry" href="cv.html">CV</a>
<a class="menu_entry" href="software.html">Software</a>
<a class="menu_entry" href="articles.html">Articles</a>
<form id="search_form" method="get" action="https://duckduckgo.com/" target="_blank"><input type="text" name="q" placeholder="Search" size="5" id="search_input" /><button type="submit" id="search_submit">&#128269;</button><input type="hidden" name="sites" value="kevinboone.me" /><input type="hidden" name="kn" value="1" /></form>
</div>

<div id="content">



<p></p>
<h1 id="going-back-to-alsa-in-2024">Going back to ALSA in 2024</h1>
<p><img src="img/notes.gif" class="article-top-image" /></p>
<p>ALSA is the low-level audio driver architecture in the Linux kernel.
It’s been around for twenty years, and I suspect it’s supported by every
Linux system on Earth that does audio. Still, over the last ten years or
so we’ve got used to not using ALSA directly. Instead, most mainstream
Linux distributions provide a sound server that wraps ALSA, and provides
additional features. The most common of these wrappers are Pulse and
PipeWire. Pulse seems these days to be mostly associated with
Ubuntu-like systems; PipeWire is more used by Fedora and its
derivatives.</p>
<p>Both Pulse and PipeWire work reasonably well for most people and,
frankly, there’s little reason to remove them. Even systems that don’t
enforce the use of an audio server, like Gentoo, still provide one, and
I suspect most users install one. However, there are a few reasons why
we might want to avoid these things, and just use ALSA directly.</p>
<ul>
<li>There are bugs in Pulse and PipeWire that can be hard to work
around.</li>
<li>Pulse/PipeWire are significant users of system resources.</li>
<li>It’s difficult to prevent Pulse/PipeWire tampering with the audio
stream, for various reasons. It sometimes isn’t even possible to bypass
Pulse/PipeWire and configure an application to use ALSA directly,
because audio servers tend to lock all the ALSA devices for their own
use. This problem makes it hard to play hifi audio sources at full
quality.</li>
<li>Pulse/Pipewire rely on services like DBus. That’s not usually a
problem in systems with integrated desktop environments, because DBus is
more-or-less essential there. In the embedded Linux world, though, we
might not have have a desktop, or even a graphical display. Reliance on
audio servers makes the development of embedded systems more
difficult.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are good reasons to persist with modern audio servers, despite
these limitations.</p>
<ul>
<li>First, application support for direct use of ALSA is diminishing.
Pulse is so ubiquitous that some application maintainers won’t support
anything else. Mozilla Firefox is a case in point. It’s possible to
build Firefox with ALSA support, but it’s recognized to be unstable. The
binary version of Firefox provided by most mainstream distributions
doesn’t have ALSA support. The Firefox maintainers should hang their
heads with shame, frankly, for letting ALSA support lapse like this.
There’s simply no justification for the developers of <em>any</em> audio
application not to support ALSA because, by supporting ALSA, you’re
automatically supporting all the other things. Still, this is the way
things are going.</li>
<li>Audio servers like Pulse are actually useful. You might not realize
just how useful, until you try to do without one.</li>
<li>Modern desktop environments like Gnome increasingly assume that an
audio server is available. Some things that seem absolutely fundamental,
like being able to control audio volume, won’t work without
fiddling.</li>
<li>It’s hard to get rid of Pulse or PipeWire on systems that have it.
On Ubuntu you can <code>apt remove pulseaudio</code> but that will take
a heap of other stuff with it, which you’ll then have to reinstall. And
then Pulse will keep coming back. It’s a drag, frankly.</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="what-to-expect-with-alsa-alone">What to expect with ALSA
alone</h2>
<p>If you really do want to remove Pulse/PipeWire, and have the
perseverance to do it, here’s what you can expect.</p>
<h3 id="audio-mixing-does-work-despite-what-everybody-says">Audio mixing
<em>does</em> work, despite what everybody says</h3>
<p>One of the claimed benefits of Pulse, when it was first released, was
that it would allow multiple applications to play audio at the same
time. ALSA has had this support built in for at least ten years. What
Pulse can do, however, and ALSA can’t, is provide separate volume
controls for different applications.</p>
<h3
id="there-may-or-may-not-be-audio-control-integration-in-the-desktop">There
may, or may not, be audio control integration in the desktop</h3>
<p>I use Xfce4 which does, in principle, have an ALSA mixer control. I
say ‘in principle’ because, so far as I can see, it doesn’t exist in any
of the mainstream Linux repositories. You’d have to build it from
source.</p>
<p>Of course, you can always run <code>alsamixer</code> in a terminal –
it’s just the lack of a graphical control that’s a nuisance.</p>
<p>You’ll probably also find that the keyboard volume controls won’t
work. You should be able to map these keys to <code>alsactl</code>
commands to change the volume but, if you have multiple ALSA audio
devices, it won’t always be obvious which one you’re changing.</p>
<h3
id="youll-probably-have-to-tell-software-which-alsa-device-to-use">You’ll
probably have to tell software which ALSA device to use</h3>
<p>ALSA dates from a time before it was common to have multiple audio
devices in the same computer. Now it uncommon not to. Most computers
will have at least one conventional soundcard, and one or more HDMI
audio channels.</p>
<p>You’ll probably have to tell your software which device to use, and
the way to do that will vary from one application to another. For VLC,
for example, I do:</p>
<pre><code>$ vlc -A ALSA --alsa-audio-device=...</code></pre>
<p>Working out which ALSA device to use can be a challenge. Even if the
software lists the ones it knows about (as the VLC graphical interface
can) the list almost certainly won’t be complete. You have to know
something about how ALSA works to choose the right device. I go into
this subject more in my article on <a
href="alsa_bitperfect.html">bit-perfect ALSA</a>.</p>
<p>For simple cases, I wrote a little Java program <a
href="https://github.com/kevinboone/jalsaselector">jalsaselector</a>
which changes the default ALSA output card.</p>
<p>You certainly won’t be able to change ALSA devices whilst an
application is running. That’s a capability that really does need an
audio server.</p>
<h3
id="apulse-can-come-to-the-rescue-when-applications-only-support-pulse"><code>apulse</code>
can come to the rescue when applications only support Pulse</h3>
<p><a href="https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse">apulse</a> is an
application wrapper that intercepts API calls to Pulse, and converts
them to ALSA operations. It works for both input and output. It’s not
foolproof, because it doesn’t implement the entire Pulse API; but it’s
sufficient, for example, for making Firefox do Zoom calls.</p>
<p><code>apulse</code> has the same problem that all ALSA applications
have in the modern world: it doesn’t provide an easy way to select
between multiple audio devices. At the command line, you can use
environment variables, like this:</p>
<pre><code>$ APULSE_PLAYBACK_DEVICE=bluealsa apulse firefox</code></pre>
<p>This way of working won’t give you a way to change output or input
devices on the fly, once the application is running; but that’s a
problem with ALSA in general, not with <code>apulse</code>.</p>
<h3
id="headphones-will-be-a-headache.-well-bluetooth-ones-will.">Headphones
will be a headache. Well, Bluetooth ones will.</h3>
<p>Assuming that your Linux installation provides fundamental Bluetooth
support – so you can list, pair, connect, and disconnect devices – you
can use <a href="https://github.com/Arkq/bluez-alsa">bluealsa</a> to
make the connection between ALSA and the Linux Bluetooth stack.</p>
<p><code>bluealsa</code> runs as a daemon, and interacts with DBus for
finding device information. Some fiddly configuration at the DBus level
is necessary for it to work with non-root users.</p>
<p><code>bluealsa</code> provides an ALSA <em>protocol</em>, not a
<em>card</em>. It won’t appear, for example, in the list of cards you
get from <code>/proc/asound/cards</code>. This means that it usually
isn’t seen as a potential target by audio applications, even those with
good ALSA support. You’ll have to specify the <code>bluealsa</code>
device on the command line and, again, the way to do that varies between
applications.</p>
<p>Because ALSA doesn’t support dynamic switching of output devices,
making a Bluetooth device a default is hazardous because, if the
Bluetooth device is switched off, ALSA will have no output at all.</p>
<p>Another problem is that the version of <code>bluealsa</code> in
mainstream Linux repositories probably won’t support high-quality audio
profiles like AptX. These are proprietary, and subject to patent
complications. I believe you can get this support by building
<code>bluealsa</code> from source, if you have the necessary
dependencies. I haven’t tried this, so I can’t comment on how well it
works. Without AptX and the like, the best audio quality you’ll get is
A2DP. That’s not the worst of the Bluetooth audio profiles in common
use, but it’s still pretty awful.</p>
<p>Finding the necessary documentation to set this all up is quite
difficult, because Bluetooth support and ALSA support are documented –
to the extent that they are documented at all – in different places.
Expect some head-scratching.</p>
<p>All in all, while an ALSA-only system will support Bluetooth audio, I
have to wonder whether it’s worth the effort.</p>
<h2 id="the-future">The future</h2>
<p>Of the Linux distributions I use, only Gentoo provides adequate
documentation for using ALSA alone. Gentoo even has some documentation
for <code>bluealsa</code>. At this time, nearly all the software you
need to run an ALSA-only Linux effectively on Fedora or Ubuntu is still
in these distributions’ binary repositories. How long that will remain
the case, as the distributions continue to focus their efforts on Pulse
and PipeWire, remains to be seen. Even now, removing Pulse from Ubuntu,
or PipeWire from Fedora, is so difficult that it’s hardly worth the
effort.</p>
<p>Gentoo, however, continues to make an ALSA-only system practicable,
with a bit of effort. Well, a lot of effort, if you want to use
Bluetooth audio.</p>

<p><span class="footer-clearance-para"/></p>
</div>

<div id="footer">
<a href="rss.html"><img src="img/rss.png" width="24px" height="24px"/></a>
Categories: <a href="hifi-groupindex.html">hifi</a>, <a href="Linux-groupindex.html">Linux</a>

<span class="last-updated">Last update Jun 30 2024
</span>
</div>

</body>
</html>


Loading

0 comments on commit 99a69d3

Please sign in to comment.