Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

amplicon ONT sequencing of 740 known strains #85

Open
weishwu opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

amplicon ONT sequencing of 740 known strains #85

weishwu opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@weishwu
Copy link

weishwu commented Nov 8, 2024

Thanks for developing Strainy!
I'm trying to use amplicon-based Nanopore reads to figure out strain abundances in bacterial samples. The pool has 740 strains and each sample may contain ~10 of them. I have the reference sequences of all these strains. I've been calculating the abundances based the alignments after stringent filtering to exclude potential sequencing errors. I'd like to try Strainy to see if I can get better results.
Since I already have the strain references, I will use these sequences as the input to Strainy, but wonder whether Strainy has the resolution to distinguish two strains if they differ only at a couple of SNVs.

@weishwu weishwu changed the title Work with known strain references Work with 740 known strain references with high similarity Nov 8, 2024
@weishwu weishwu changed the title Work with 740 known strain references with high similarity amplicon ONT sequencing of 740 known strains Nov 8, 2024
@atabeerk
Copy link
Collaborator

atabeerk commented Nov 9, 2024

Hi @weishwu,

A couple of SNVs would be tricky for strainy. If they are close enough on the same unitig, strainy may be able to phase that unitig but if they are far apart, it would be more difficult.

If that doesn't work, you may try using one of the single strain references as the input.

@weishwu
Copy link
Author

weishwu commented Nov 12, 2024

@atabeerk Thanks for your quick reply!
My references are just ~1kb since this is amplicon sequencing, so I think it's promising.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants