Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checklist Confidence Field Issue #4350

Open
dimasciput opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Checklist Confidence Field Issue #4350

dimasciput opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@dimasciput
Copy link
Member

Is it possible to populate the Confidence field in the csv checklist download with the highest Certainty field information across all source templates? This field is currently blank.
For example, if Papio ursinus has High, Medium and Low Certainty across three different occurrence uploads respectively, that the Confidence field in the checklist download is High. Or if only Medium and Potential Distribution, the Confidence would be Medium etc.

Hierarchy of Certainty (and Confidence) dropdowns:
High
Medium
Low
Potential Distribution
Outdated Distribution
Unknown

I am unsure how this would work when there are only GBIF sources though. Please let us know what you advise.

@dimasciput dimasciput added SIZE 2 Give me 2 hours and I will have it for you SANParks project labels Nov 18, 2024
@dimasciput dimasciput self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
@dimasciput dimasciput moved this to 🏃This Sprint in SANParks Nov 18, 2024
@dimasciput dimasciput added SIZE 3 and removed SIZE 2 Give me 2 hours and I will have it for you labels Nov 18, 2024
@dimasciput dimasciput moved this from 🏃This Sprint to 🛒TODO in SANParks Nov 18, 2024
@dimasciput
Copy link
Member Author

@helendallas this is feasible, but I will need 3-4 hours to implement it. Should I go ahead?

@helendallas
Copy link
Collaborator

@dimasciput Maybe finish off the other remaining tickets first as there are only about 25 hours remaining.

@helendallas
Copy link
Collaborator

Please action this as SANParks need it.

@dimasciput
Copy link
Member Author

dimasciput commented Nov 26, 2024

@helendallas, the issue with the blank certainty field is because they uploaded occurrence data with 'Certainty' as the column name, instead of 'Certainty of Identification'. I believe I already provided the correct template for this. I think it would be better for them to re-upload the data with the correct format rather than me fixing it on the backend.

I will add the hierarchy today.

@dimasciput dimasciput moved this from 🏃This Sprint to 👩In Progress in SANParks Nov 26, 2024
@helendallas
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed @dimasciput I have emailed them

@helendallas
Copy link
Collaborator

@dimasciput From Dian

Our current certainty field contains the following Certainty

High
Medium
Low
Unknown
Potential Distribution
Outdated Distribution

i.e. it is not just about identification. I think the field may have originally been focused on identification only (confidence/certainty of identification, maybe) but then we later changed it to certainty. Or we considered confidence and kept certainty or changed confidence to certainty. I can’t remember but the field is not only around identification now it is also around whether it is likely that species occurs in that place. i.e. if a species was somewhere fifty years ago, then we might not know whether it is there now and if a species is only known to be within a distribution range, then you don’t know if it is actually in the park.

@dimasciput I suggest you update to Certainty, is this a BIMS table for managing or is is hard coded? if latter then please add those listed above.

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 👩In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants