You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CJGutz opened this issue
Apr 17, 2024
· 0 comments
Labels
featureNew feature or requestInspectorRelated to the separated business logic of the website's inspectorWebsiteRelated to the user interface and experience to use the inspector
Users don't know which standard their VC follows. We need to show that.
Describe the solution you would like
Go through the calculated attributes and schema results to try and autofind the standard that was inserted. This is then returned to the website. Possible to look through the results and see which standard got most ok. There might still be errors from the standard that got most correct. Therefore we cannot assert that the format is correct. Only suggest or say "most likely"
Acceptance Criteria
As long as the initial parse was a success, it is possible to see which standard is suggested.
Each string that is parsed successfully (showing issuer or credentialSubject for example while still perhaps having some issues) should show a suggested standard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CJGutz
added
Inspector
Related to the separated business logic of the website's inspector
Website
Related to the user interface and experience to use the inspector
labels
Apr 17, 2024
featureNew feature or requestInspectorRelated to the separated business logic of the website's inspectorWebsiteRelated to the user interface and experience to use the inspector
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Users don't know which standard their VC follows. We need to show that.
Describe the solution you would like
Go through the calculated attributes and schema results to try and autofind the standard that was inserted. This is then returned to the website. Possible to look through the results and see which standard got most ok. There might still be errors from the standard that got most correct. Therefore we cannot assert that the format is correct. Only suggest or say "most likely"
Acceptance Criteria
As long as the initial parse was a success, it is possible to see which standard is suggested.
Each string that is parsed successfully (showing issuer or credentialSubject for example while still perhaps having some issues) should show a suggested standard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: