We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thanks for your wonderful work!
I would like to use the original training and test sets, keeping the same sequences as in the original paper. I ran the file https://nbviewer.org/github/johli/aparent/blob/master/analysis/evaluate_aparent_random_mpra_legacy.ipynb and found that every library had the same test number. It seems different from the split in Figure 1. C in the paper.
Thanks for your time! Best regards!
Original paper: evaluate_aparent_random_mpra_legacy.ipynb:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Thanks for your wonderful work!
I would like to use the original training and test sets, keeping the same sequences as in the original paper. I ran the file https://nbviewer.org/github/johli/aparent/blob/master/analysis/evaluate_aparent_random_mpra_legacy.ipynb and found that every library had the same test number. It seems different from the split in Figure 1. C in the paper.
Thanks for your time!
Best regards!
Original paper:
evaluate_aparent_random_mpra_legacy.ipynb:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: