README and emacs-lisp content

[DamienCassou]

I see you are writing your documentation as a string inside an emacs-lisp program and then generate a README file. If you don't find it convenient, you might want to try the approach used by the buttercup project. This project has some documentation (written in Markdown) containing tests that are both visible as documentation and executable as test suite.

[joelmccracken]

Oh sweet! I like it. If/when I pick this up again I'll experiment.

…

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 3, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Damien Cassou ***@***.***> wrote: I see you are writing your documentation as a string inside an emacs-lisp program and then generate a README file. If you don't find it convenient, you might want to try the approach used by the buttercup project. This project has some documentation (written in Markdown) containing tests that are both visible as documentation and executable as test suite. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.