From 8e0ac1d1674bfab5c949ce0b6bc72fa5ff6102e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin von Zweigbergk Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 06:11:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] docs: conflicted branches have two "?" as suffix Looks like we forgot to update this when we changed from one to two question marks. --- docs/branches.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/branches.md b/docs/branches.md index c792ed4b32..ce38cc0ed0 100644 --- a/docs/branches.md +++ b/docs/branches.md @@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ current branch commit, even if it isn't entirely accurate. Branches can end up in a conflicted state. When that happens, `jj status` will include information about the conflicted branches (and instructions for how to mitigate it). `jj branch list` will have details. `jj log` will show the branch -name with a question mark suffix (e.g. `main?`) on each of the conflicted -branch's potential target revisions. Using the branch name to look up a revision -will resolve to all potential targets. That means that `jj new main` will error -out, complaining that the revset resolved to multiple revisions. +name with a double question mark suffix (e.g. `main??`) on each of the +conflicted branch's potential target revisions. Using the branch name to look up +a revision will resolve to all potential targets. That means that `jj new main` +will error out, complaining that the revset resolved to multiple revisions. Both local branches (e.g. `main`) and the remote branch (e.g. `main@origin`) can have conflicts. Both can end up in that state if concurrent operations were run