You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using the Code 39 barcode type and populating the barcode field with data from a CSV file using the syntax ${barcode}, the default size of the field seems to be determined by the literal string ${barcode}. This results in an inability to adjust the field width dynamically based on the varying lengths of the barcode data for labels with dimensions 3.2mm x 2.5mm.
Steps to Reproduce:
Open gLabelsQt.
Create a new label with dimensions 3.2mm x 2.5mm and link it to a CSV file with a barcode column using the syntax ${barcode}.
Observe that the barcode field size does not adapt to the length of the barcode data.
Expected Behavior:
The barcode field should dynamically adjust its size based on the length of the actual barcode data when linked to a CSV column, especially for labels with dimensions 3.2mm x 2.5mm.
Observed Behavior:
The barcode field size is determined by the literal string ${barcode}, making it difficult to accommodate varying lengths of barcode data for 3.2mm x 2.5mm labels (too small).
Screenshots:
Field
Raw
Printing
Possible Solution:
To allow for a greater expansion of the minimum size of the barcodes
Impact:
The barcode overflows during printing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using the Code 39 barcode type and populating the barcode field with data from a CSV file using the syntax ${barcode}, the default size of the field seems to be determined by the literal string ${barcode}. This results in an inability to adjust the field width dynamically based on the varying lengths of the barcode data for labels with dimensions 3.2mm x 2.5mm.
Steps to Reproduce:
Expected Behavior:
The barcode field should dynamically adjust its size based on the length of the actual barcode data when linked to a CSV column, especially for labels with dimensions 3.2mm x 2.5mm.
Observed Behavior:
The barcode field size is determined by the literal string ${barcode}, making it difficult to accommodate varying lengths of barcode data for 3.2mm x 2.5mm labels (too small).
Screenshots:
Field
Raw
Printing
Possible Solution:
To allow for a greater expansion of the minimum size of the barcodes
Impact:
The barcode overflows during printing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: