Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

return needed #44

Open
carltonj2000 opened this issue Nov 17, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

return needed #44

carltonj2000 opened this issue Nov 17, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@carltonj2000
Copy link

Your first usage example has a return but the second one does not. That made all the difference for me. Without the return the rsync would not work. So maybe you can update your second usage example so that it has a return.

@ebaskoro
Copy link
Collaborator

G'day,

That's a good point. We will modify it ASAP. Cheers for that.

Eki

On 18 Nov 2016 5:25 AM, "Carlton Joseph" [email protected] wrote:

Your first usage example has a return but the second one does not. That
made all the difference for me. Without the return the rsync would not
work. So maybe you can update your second usage example so that it has a
return.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#44, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAaTwRUB5MPkdZy-hW3Z-80WfR5vyUgMks5q_JwUgaJpZM4K1pLO
.

@c-johnson
Copy link

Huge bump. Had no idea this return stated was needed in gulp.

@c-johnson
Copy link

Can anyone explain why this is? I get how not returning properly can mess up Gulp's default task ordering, but I don't understand why this wouldn't actually execute the rsync function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants