Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NuGet dependency vulnerabilities #146

Open
jmisharp opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

NuGet dependency vulnerabilities #146

jmisharp opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@jmisharp
Copy link

Current version 6.2.1 of the Respawn package has a security vulnerability because of an old dependency to Microsoft.Data.SqlClient, that has a dependency to [email protected].

.NET Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (This package is used under: [email protected]>[email protected]>[email protected]>[email protected]>[email protected]>[email protected])

Please update to mitigate this vulnerability.

CVE description: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24112

@alexTr3
Copy link

alexTr3 commented Nov 12, 2024

there is also azure core identity that is referenced for no reasons.. REMOVE THIS ASAP..

@Thijmen
Copy link

Thijmen commented Nov 16, 2024

Follow this as well - can we get a fix in for this?

@Thijmen
Copy link

Thijmen commented Nov 16, 2024

For those running into this, I fixed this by adding the dependency with the proper version (in my case it was Azure.Identity)

  <ItemGroup>
    <!-- Fixes for transitive dependencies -->
    <PackageReference Include="Azure.Identity" />
  </ItemGroup>

And then make sure to add the proper version in your Directory.Packages.prop

@Thijmen
Copy link

Thijmen commented Nov 16, 2024

While I also can understand that you also fix direct CVE's - please understand that the SqlClient imports some very old outdated stuff with a lot of CVE's. It would help us tremendously to update this package, to keep our projects maintainable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants