You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Brain age model are often impacted by the regression to the mean, resulting an overestimation of the age of younger subjects and an underestimation of the age of older subjects. I tested this model on PPMI dataset, but found that most subjects are with much younger brain age.
I think some correction should be conducted here. For example, one way is to rely on the slope (alpha) and intercept (beta) of a linear regression model of BrainAGE against chronological age in the training set. This way an offset is calculated (as alpha * omega + beta) and then subtracted from the estimated brain-age to yield a bias-free BrainAGE.
Could you offer the the alpha, beta value of this BrainAgeR model? or any suggestions on correcting brain age when using BrainAgeR model?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
Thanks for your interest in brainageR. I totally agree re: the regression to the mean effect being an issue, though my preference is not to adjust the model. The effect is more pronounced when the fit is bad, and I think it is important to detect generalisability issues.
My view is that it is more transparent to covary for chronological age in subsequent analyses, and will be statistically equivalent in most cases. See https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220300668
Hope that helps,
James
From: jojowang-17 ***@***.***>
Date: Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 6:47 pm
To: james-cole/brainageR ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: [james-cole/brainageR] How to correct predicted brain age? (Issue #13)
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi,
Brain age model are often impacted by the regression to the mean, resulting an overestimation of the age of younger subjects and an underestimation of the age of older subjects. I tested this model on PPMI dataset, but found that most subjects are with much younger brain age.
I think some correction should be conducted here. For example, one way is to rely on the slope (alpha) and intercept (beta) of a linear regression model of BrainAGE against chronological age in the training set. This way an offset is calculated (as alpha * omega + beta) and then subtracted from the estimated brain-age to yield a bias-free BrainAGE.
Could you offer the the alpha, beta value of this BrainAgeR model? or any suggestions on correcting brain age when using BrainAgeR model?
Thanks!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#13>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCUV6BFBVF3EYVTCNQE5GTYV53UJAVCNFSM6AAAAABD6SGZ4SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE2TSNRSGAZDSMI>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Hi,
Brain age model are often impacted by the regression to the mean, resulting an overestimation of the age of younger subjects and an underestimation of the age of older subjects. I tested this model on PPMI dataset, but found that most subjects are with much younger brain age.
I think some correction should be conducted here. For example, one way is to rely on the slope (alpha) and intercept (beta) of a linear regression model of BrainAGE against chronological age in the training set. This way an offset is calculated (as alpha * omega + beta) and then subtracted from the estimated brain-age to yield a bias-free BrainAGE.
Could you offer the the alpha, beta value of this BrainAgeR model? or any suggestions on correcting brain age when using BrainAgeR model?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: