You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is recommended to separate the class definition and implementation into two files, otherwise, it may lead to multiple definitions, which can cause link errors. For example:
// head1.hpp
#include"EasyBMP.hpp"
// main.cpp
#include"head1.hpp"
By splitting the class definition (EasyBMP.hpp) and implementation (EasyBMP.cpp), you avoid issues such as multiple definitions when including the header in different files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is recommended to separate the class definition and implementation into two files, otherwise, it may lead to multiple definitions, which can cause link errors. For example:
// head1.hpp
#include"EasyBMP.hpp"
// main.cpp
#include"head1.hpp"
By splitting the class definition (EasyBMP.hpp) and implementation (EasyBMP.cpp), you avoid issues such as multiple definitions when including the header in different files.
The purpose of this library was to be minimal and keep it in a single file. This could be solved by adding preprocessor definitions and conditionals. Does this solution fit your needs? If it's the case, feel free to fork and start a pull request.
It is recommended to separate the class definition and implementation into two files, otherwise, it may lead to multiple definitions, which can cause link errors. For example:
By splitting the class definition (
EasyBMP.hpp
) and implementation (EasyBMP.cpp
), you avoid issues such as multiple definitions when including the header in different files.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: