-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
/
VEP-012.txt
57 lines (49 loc) · 2.65 KB
/
VEP-012.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Vocabulary: http://www.ivoa.net/rdf/voresource/date_role
Author: Markus Demleitner <[email protected]>
Date: 2022-03-07
Superceded-by: VEP-013
New Term: Validated
Action: Addition
Label: Last validated
Description: Dates with this role indicate when the resource has last
undergone a non-formal validation. This will usually involve a human
ensuring that the resource still works as expectable, both technically
and as regards science content. The prototypical case is when tutors
ensure a written tutorial still describes the real behaviour of
clients and services.
Relationships:
Used-in: The registry record ivo://edu.gavo.org/hd/gavo_addpms (and most
other IVOA document records; cf.
<http://dc.zah.uni-heidelberg.de/wirr/q/ui/fixed?field0=restype&operator0=%3D&operand0=doc%3Adocument>)
Rationale:
The prototypical case is for tutorials, where the date of the last
validation is a good indication for the amount of work that might be
necessary to use the tutorial in teaching VO technology -- or, in
self-study, how many deviations of actual behaviour are to be
expected. The directory of registered texts at
http://dc.g-vo.org/VOTT lets users sort the results by this date
("Date Checked").
It is conceivable that data centers use this concept for data
services, too, for instance as part of a certification procedure,
but the author does not see that as an immediate need.
This term is not intended for use with vr:Validation. For one, even
validation level 4 only applies to the registry record rather than the
resource itself, and hence the concept does not apply anyway. In
addition, validationLevel elements are, if at all, added by
harvestable full registries which must not modify the records outside
of the validationLevel elements and hence could not add curation/date
elements anyway.
The non-standard, mixed-case form of the concept identifier is for
consistency with the other terms in the vocabulary, which again
preserve the form of DataCite date roles.
Discussion:
The identifier "Validated" perhaps is not ideal as there already is
an identifier "Valid" in date_role from DataCite, which denotes
something entirely different. One might consider using "LastChecked"
for the present concept instead. The author of this VEP could easily
be swayed to prefer that, but for now believes the risk of people
confusing "Valid" and "Validated" is sufficiently low to be taken for
the benefit of not having camel case identifiers.
This consideration was found important enough at the Semantics Calls 6
telecon on 2022-03-14 to warrant abandoning this VEP and create a new
one for #Inspected (VEP-013).