New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using vocabularies instead of literal enumerations #61

Open

lmichel opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Collaborator

lmichel commented Nov 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading

In some places, this draft uses literal enumerations to specify some property roles:

Calibration level
Colour definition (magnitude ratio vs hardness ratio)
Shape definition (MOC, STCS...)
Possibly error distribution (poisson, gaussian...) (see Property1D/2D model elements. #59)

This works fine, but has a major drawback: if an enumeration needs to be updated, we would have to create a new model version via a new RFC process.

It would be more convenient to use a VO vocabulary.

Collaborator Author

lmichel commented Nov 16, 2024

Done for the calibration level. See the draft

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment