Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPOCH query parameter #40

Open
molinaro-m opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

EPOCH query parameter #40

molinaro-m opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@molinaro-m
Copy link
Member

As expressed in this DAL (quite old) mail thread to query the sky at a given epoch.
(connected also to solar system use cases)

@molinaro-m molinaro-m added question Further information is requested time labels Aug 27, 2020
@mbtaylor
Copy link
Member

mbtaylor commented Sep 2, 2020

This looks complicated to me. Only a minority of services will be able to do anything with an EPOCH parameter, namely, those with proper motion information. So a client submitting an EPOCH parameter to the query will in general not know whether the service has honoured it or ignored it. The use case mentioned in the quoted email of locating objects corresponding to 100-year-old positions is a fairly specialist one, and could be addressed by widening the cone to accomodate even fast moving objects over the relevant interval, and then performing corrections on the client side.

For a "simple" protocol like SCS my inclination would be to avoid this level of complexity.

@molinaro-m molinaro-m added 2.x and removed question Further information is requested time labels Sep 2, 2020
@Bonnarel
Copy link

Bonnarel commented Sep 2, 2020

as in input PARAMETER it looks complicated as Mark states. (except maybe if this work as a selection of epochs available in the service without any recomputation)
For the response however the epoch of coordinates should be given in appropriate attribute of the COOSYS element

@msdemlei
Copy link
Collaborator

msdemlei commented Sep 2, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants