Replies: 1 comment
-
Agreed as a MUST. I do have it in my trainings and didn't think it could be mentioned more explicitly in the curriculum
I do consider "migration" a topic for the IMPROVE curriculum which is why we already removed "migration strategies" from the curriculum in 2015. Let's rather LINK this topic explicitly to the IMPROVE curriculum
Agreed, let's add it as a SHOULD, @sippsack
Can you elaborate on this one, @mrtnlhmnn? I do think this is part of "4. Integration" but I might be wrong. Thanks in advance.
Hm, that's a tough one. We could add it as COULD in "4. Integration", yet, I'd focus it on interface versioning and rather than on the broader services version and interoperability. LMKYT |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The current topics are not addressed (sufficiently):
a) Testing for both mono/modulithic and distributed systems (another driver / requirement)
b) Migration concepts, especially when going from a mono/modulithic system to a distributed one. Concepts like blue/green or red/black deployment and replacing parts from the monolith.
c) "Chaos Engineering", as an add-on to "Resilience"
d) Concept of an inter-service/system interface ("Schnittstelle"). How to setup such an interface, interface contract etc.
e) Versioning of systems and services (like with "Semantic Versioning")
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions