Document UCAN as one of Authorization options #88
Labels
effort/hours
Estimated to take one or several hours
good first issue
Good issue for new contributors
help wanted
Seeking public contribution on this issue
P1
High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up
topic/docs
Improvements or additions to documentation
π This is a good first issue if someone wants to open a PR β all you need it to update docs here.
Use of UCAN does not require any API changes, already existing
Authorization Bearer
HTTP header can be used for UCAN. We should document this in Authentication section at https://ipfs.github.io/pinning-services-api-spec/#section/AuthenticationReference / prior art:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: