-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Cryptographic ACL #4
Comments
Hello @pgte, is there any way I can follow your research and first approach? I am very interested in ACL on IPFS. |
I am also down to assist in this effort in any way @pgte. :) Let me know if I can help. |
Thanks Alex!
You can help in many ways. If you have experience or ideas in this subject, you can list some alternatives here. Or you can give feedback once alternatives are presented here. Thanks for your interest!
…On 22 Mar 2018, 16:53 +0000, Alex Groleau ***@***.***>, wrote:
I am also down to assist in this effort in any way @pgte. :) Let me know if I can help.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
@pgte is there a way I can get to the actual research completed thus far? I don't seem to see any links to anything in this issue. |
There's nothing written down. Just dispersed personal knowledge. |
Here is a very old survey about ACLs in networked FS (probably useless, or perhaps some gems could be found here): https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=cis_reports |
Tahoe LAFS:https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs Somewhere in this doc capabilities are discussed: https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/architecture.rst |
Goal: The path towards a Identity & Capability System on IPFS is clear
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: