Rethink about persistence of events in database #922
laumair
started this conversation in
Features / Enhancements
Replies: 1 comment
-
I think we shouldn't persist them, users should rely on our functions to get the outputs and transactions and detect deposits based on that. We just need to think about how to design it, so it's easy and clear for everyone |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Description
We persist events in the database and allow consumers to query them. The reason we added this feature was because of a specific consumer requested it. Imo, we need to rethink if this is worth it. This just bloats the database size.
Motivation
To make wallet library more scalable / performant.
Open questions (optional)
Use this section to ask any questions that are related to the feature.
Are you planning to do it yourself in a pull request?
No.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions